1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00503906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The viscosity of five liquid hydrocarbons at pressures up to 250 MPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
88
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
21
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these deviations, we can also conclude that the experimental data are internally consistent to within the estimate experimental uncertainty. Equation (16) Figure 7, we compare the new results with data from the literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] at pressures up to 10 MPa as deviations from the correlation of Tariq et al 1 Our results agree well with the majority of the experimental data reported in the literature; however, the data of Rajagapol et al 17 at temperatures below 400 K and those of Grachev et al 19 to constrain the behavior of their correlation in the liquid state at temperatures above 441 K and those data are systematically higher than ours at temperatures above 450 K. Figure 8 compares our new results with data from the literature 13,14,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] at pressure up to 10 MPa as deviations from the correlation of Huber et al 2,3 At temperatures up to 500 K, our new data agree with the correlation to within about ±1 %, which is the stated uncertainty of the correlation for the saturated liquid. At higher temperatures, the deviations are somewhat dependent upon pressure and span the interval (-3 to -6) %.…”
Section: Correlation Of the Viscosity Ratios At Low Temperatures Thsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…From these deviations, we can also conclude that the experimental data are internally consistent to within the estimate experimental uncertainty. Equation (16) Figure 7, we compare the new results with data from the literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] at pressures up to 10 MPa as deviations from the correlation of Tariq et al 1 Our results agree well with the majority of the experimental data reported in the literature; however, the data of Rajagapol et al 17 at temperatures below 400 K and those of Grachev et al 19 to constrain the behavior of their correlation in the liquid state at temperatures above 441 K and those data are systematically higher than ours at temperatures above 450 K. Figure 8 compares our new results with data from the literature 13,14,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] at pressure up to 10 MPa as deviations from the correlation of Huber et al 2,3 At temperatures up to 500 K, our new data agree with the correlation to within about ±1 %, which is the stated uncertainty of the correlation for the saturated liquid. At higher temperatures, the deviations are somewhat dependent upon pressure and span the interval (-3 to -6) %.…”
Section: Correlation Of the Viscosity Ratios At Low Temperatures Thsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…13 As discussed before, 7,9 the average radius of the wire is advantageously determined in a single experimental run at a temperature and pressure where the viscosity and density of a reference fluid are well known. Hence, a single experimental run in forced mode with water near 20°C and 0.1 MPa, which is the primary reference for viscosity, was performed to obtain an effective average radius for the wire sensor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation of Dymond and Øye [44] was heavily based on the measurements of Dymond [40] and the measurements of Oliveira and Wakeham [33] and Knapstad et al [36]. The present correlation includes measurements of additional investigators (see Table 1).…”
Section: Viscosity Correlation For Hexanementioning
confidence: 99%