1980
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The visual accommodation response during concurrent mental activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birnbaum [20] postulated that the conflicting results of Malmstrom et al [19] and Kruger [18] may be explained by optical factors. Kruger's concurrent mental task was centred on the visual stimulus for which accommodation was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Birnbaum [20] postulated that the conflicting results of Malmstrom et al [19] and Kruger [18] may be explained by optical factors. Kruger's concurrent mental task was centred on the visual stimulus for which accommodation was measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area of contention that exists, however, is the effect of mental effort or cognitive demand on accommodation. Kruger [18] showed that when 20 subjects changed from passive reading of two-digit numbers at 40 cm to adding the numbers there was a significant increase in mean accommodative response of 0.28 D. Malmstrom [19] demonstrated, however, that a written backward-counting task could produce a decrease in accommodative response of 0.25-0.75 D for a 3.00 D target. Malmstrom and his co-workers have suggested that cognitive induced shifts in accommodation are caused by changes in the autonomic balance of the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the subjects added the numbers the mean accommodation to the screen during the 30 s treatment period was significantly greater by 0.28 D than when they only read the numbers. Malmstrom et al ( 1980) tested subjects who observed a fixation target at different viewing distances for a 30 s period and concurrently wrote down numbers as they counted backwards. When the target was at a 33 cm viewing distance accommodation was lower by about 0.25 D during the mental task compared with the condition where they simply observed the fixation target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in similar experimental conditions, e.g. viewing close targets, mental tasks may produce an increase in accommodation (Kruger, 1980), B decrease (Malmstrom et al, 1980), or no change (Gawron, Paap and Malmstrom, 1985). The type and the difficulty of the mental tasks may have differed between studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%