2016
DOI: 10.12913/22998624/64066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Visual Method in Quality Assessment of Single-Lap Adhesive Joints

Abstract: This article presents selected criteria for the quality assessment of single-lap adhesive joints formed on 0.66±0.04 thick hot dip zinc coated sheets with the hot dip zinc coating thickness equal to 18 µm. Three types of epoxy adhesives and three variants of the mass of adhesives were tested (1 g, 2 g and 3 g). The work intended to assess the capacity of the visual method with regard to evaluating joint quality, allowing for the presence and the size of spew fillet, joint dimensions and the effect of spew fill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the nature of the damage was conducted with three methods: a visual inspection [13,14], with an optical microscope [15,16] and with often used [17,18] electron microscope. The visual analysis made with the naked eye, due to a small thickness of the adhesive joint and low contrast with a metal or transparency of certain adhesives is, in a number of cases, hampered and does not prove certain as for the nature of the damage (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the nature of the damage was conducted with three methods: a visual inspection [13,14], with an optical microscope [15,16] and with often used [17,18] electron microscope. The visual analysis made with the naked eye, due to a small thickness of the adhesive joint and low contrast with a metal or transparency of certain adhesives is, in a number of cases, hampered and does not prove certain as for the nature of the damage (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to destructive methods for evaluating adhesive joints, non-destructive techniques are utilized. Non-destructive methods used for the estimation of adhesive joints include—first of all—such methods as visual [ 21 ], ultrasonic [ 22 , 23 ], acoustic emission [ 24 ] and thermographic [ 25 ], as well as terahertz [ 26 ] and synchrotron X-ray technology which are also widely used in non-destructive testing [ 27 ]. Among these methods, ultrasound, which is based on the phenomenon of the reflection and refraction of waves with frequencies above 16 kHz, is often used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining the right adhesive joint requires consideration of material, technological, constructional and related factors with joining operation [11,12]. The strength of adhesive joints depends on the properties of the adhesive, the type of materials to be joined, the dimensions of the adhesive joint, type and load value, curing time and loading, temperature, mechanical properties of the adhesive and physical properties of the adhreneds [13][14][15][16][17]. The surface treatment process of galvanized steel sheets usually includes degreasing, etching, rinsing and drying operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%