1992
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8659.1130139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Visualization Input Pipeline ‐ Enabling Semantic Interaction in Scientific Visualization

Abstract: Scientific Visualization systems are primarily output‐oriented, Users can specify and change parameters that are controlling the visualization process, which will result in different data representations or images respectively. But no mechanism is provided to really interact with the application data (semantic interaction) that has been changed step by step by the process of visualization. In this paper general concepts are elaborated and presented to achieve semantic interaction in dataflow environments for S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Felger and Schröder [27] in the visualization input pipeline (VIP) describe linked cursors, another example of linked navigation is by Plumlee and Ware [47]. Other forms of navigation include data probing, as implemented within both LinkWinds [32] and KBVision [4] and changing the viewport information, as accomplished in SciAn [44] and Visage [57] which provide coordinated manipulation of 3D views.…”
Section: Tools and Toolkitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Felger and Schröder [27] in the visualization input pipeline (VIP) describe linked cursors, another example of linked navigation is by Plumlee and Ware [47]. Other forms of navigation include data probing, as implemented within both LinkWinds [32] and KBVision [4] and changing the viewport information, as accomplished in SciAn [44] and Visage [57] which provide coordinated manipulation of 3D views.…”
Section: Tools and Toolkitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If connected this way, the values of parameters are synchronized. Demand-driven approaches provide the option to upstream information through the data-flow [18], enabling interaction with visualizations [21]. In Improvise [46], the coordination between views is configured using relational expressions and can then be visualized as a coordination graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objects, such as pointers, annotations or metainformation, may be coupled. For instance, the developers of the visualization input pipeline (VIP) (Felger and Schröder, 1992) describe an example that displays several views of the data with the cursors linked together; movement of one pointer causes the others to move correspondingly. Other forms of navigation include data probing, as implemented within both LinkWinds (Jacobson et al, 1994) and KBVision (Amerinex, 1992), and changing the viewport information, as accomplished in SciAn (Pepke and Lyons, 1993) and Visage (Roth et al, 1996), which provide coordinated manipulation of 3D views.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%