1968
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62498-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Vital Role of the Distal Urethral Segment in the Control of Urinary Flow Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluoroscopic measures of the urethra in female children have reported values similar to those we observed [Gleason and Bottaccini, 1968]. Measurements from four subjects showed an average urethral diameter of 1.8 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fluoroscopic measures of the urethra in female children have reported values similar to those we observed [Gleason and Bottaccini, 1968]. Measurements from four subjects showed an average urethral diameter of 1.8 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Turbulence has been estimated previously to cause energy losses of 10^30% in the urethra of women [Ritter et al, 1964;Spangberg et al, 1989]. However, the tapering shape of the bladder neck and proximal urethra as well as the short urethra in women minimizes viscous losses and facilitates laminar £ow in the urethra [Gleason and Bottaccini, 1968], making the assumptions in Bernoulli's formula reasonable ones to model voiding. If the model presented here were to include energy losses due to turbulence, the areas based on urodynamic data would be larger than predicted from Bernoulli's formula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow dynamical assessment, especially vorticity formation in the urine stream, is an undeveloped approach to LUT function. More than 50 years ago, Gleason and Bottaccini [26][27][28][29] investigated the association between flow dynamics and LUT function or urethral shape. However, technological limitations may have been obstacles in the development of flow dynamical assessment of LUT function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators proposed Reynolds numbers for non-obstructed urethral flows. For example, Gleason and Bottaccini [1968] reported (using radiologic evidence) Reynolds numbers of 1,000-3,000 within the upper urethra, implying laminar/ transitional flow, whereas Backman [1971] reported Reynolds numbers ranging from 10,000 to 20,300 (with a mean of 14,000), implying turbulent flow. Sterling et al [1983] proposed Reynolds numbers ranging between 10 3 and 10 4 , suggesting flows that may be laminar, transitional, or turbulent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%