The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Design/methodology/approach -The methodological design was ethnographic both in terms of data collection and analysis. Volunteering and participant observation began in November 2013 and is ongoing. The data presented are derived from field notes of participant observations.Findings -Tensions are present when considering how best to write up ethnographic research when the researcher adopts a "volunteer ethnographer" role. The negotiation of relationships, practices, and emotions requires the researcher to appreciate the complex and "politicized" discourse surrounding foodbank use in order to report how the foodbank operates in an objective yet truly reflective way.Originality/value -There is an expanding research interest in the growth of foodbanks. This paper offers unique insights into the value and tensions of adopting the dual role of "volunteer ethnographer" when researching foodbank use in the UK.