2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2020.101968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vulnerability of shellfish farmers to HAB events: An optimal matching analysis of closure decrees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fish aquaculture, the economic loss is clear in extreme events causing fish mortality (Karlson et al, 2021) but the losses due to minor fish kills and sub-lethal events require careful evaluation of the mitigation strategies and a cost assessment would involve reviewing aquaculture business planning as well as sharing of monitoring and potentially sensitive commercial information between industry and scientists (Davidson et al, 2020). For shellfish aquaculture, economical evaluation of costs is more difficult since biogeography, seasonal variability, regularity of the bloom, type of shellfish and commercialisation issues can strongly modulate the cost of HAB (Rodriguez et al, 2011;Martino et al, 2020;Guillotreau et al, 2021;Karlson et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fish aquaculture, the economic loss is clear in extreme events causing fish mortality (Karlson et al, 2021) but the losses due to minor fish kills and sub-lethal events require careful evaluation of the mitigation strategies and a cost assessment would involve reviewing aquaculture business planning as well as sharing of monitoring and potentially sensitive commercial information between industry and scientists (Davidson et al, 2020). For shellfish aquaculture, economical evaluation of costs is more difficult since biogeography, seasonal variability, regularity of the bloom, type of shellfish and commercialisation issues can strongly modulate the cost of HAB (Rodriguez et al, 2011;Martino et al, 2020;Guillotreau et al, 2021;Karlson et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second action, based on monitoring data, consists of the implementation of a range of measures including fisheries and harvest bans in order to avoid the marketing of contaminated products to the end consumers. These bans may lead to economic impacts on activities depending on water quality and marine resources, such as fisheries and aquaculture [6][7][8][9]. The implementation of these measures is a complex process which is mainly based on monitoring, but also involves other factors in order to minimise the economic impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2016, the management authorities have digitalized some of the closure decrees, but the information is still scattered and uncompleted, and there are no available data on older periods. Guillotreau et al (2021) [9] have created a database of closures based on legal decrees regarding HAB-related closures, but this dataset concerns only shellfish farming activities and it is only related to the coastal area along the western French coasts (Finistère, Morbihan, Loire-Atlantique and Vendée). Data on administrative fishing restrictions are still very few and sparse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, socio-economic risk analysis based on observed closures (e.g. [34]) may be less suitable for these specific contexts such as scallop fisheries. The use of theoretical closures, as proposed in this work, refers to the consideration of a notion of risk based on toxicity, which is a pertinent proxy to assess ecological risks and socio-economic impacts associated with HAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%