2003
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.10214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “wandering needle”

Abstract: Suspected aspiration of a radiopaque foreign body can easily be confirmed by a chest film. We report a case of a boy with chest-film confirmed aspiration of a needle into his right main bronchus, in whom no needle was found during bronchoscopy. In retrospect, the boy had expectorated the needle without noticing it in the interval between making the diagnosis and the actual bronchoscopy. We propose to reconfirm aspiration of a radiopaque foreign body by fluoroscopy shortly before commencing bronchoscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common problem in pin aspiration is that pins can migrate into the airways even with only minor coughing, and due to this, it may be difficult to find them in the same location as they had been in the plain X-ray taken before bronchoscopy (3,14). When faced with a difficult, or distally Figure 1 A chest X-ray of a patient in group II who aspirated two pins, one in the trachea and the other in the left main bronchus located foreign body, fluoroscopic guidance may provide the needed visibility required for successful removal (4,10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem in pin aspiration is that pins can migrate into the airways even with only minor coughing, and due to this, it may be difficult to find them in the same location as they had been in the plain X-ray taken before bronchoscopy (3,14). When faced with a difficult, or distally Figure 1 A chest X-ray of a patient in group II who aspirated two pins, one in the trachea and the other in the left main bronchus located foreign body, fluoroscopic guidance may provide the needed visibility required for successful removal (4,10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there is one report of an 8-yearold boy who must have expectorated a needle without noticing, because the bronchoscopy performed a little later also revealed no foreign body after chest-film confirmed aspiration of a needle into his right main bronchus. 4 However, there is no other report of a needle aspiration with concomitant ingestion without this being suspected by the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Spontaneous expectoration is not totally safe, there is a risk that the foreign body will get stuck in the subglottic area or even injure the airway if sharp enough, thus causing a lifethreatening emergency [18]. In some patients, the foreign body can be expectorated and ingested to the gastrointestinal tract, this may lead to unnecessary bronchoscopy especially if the x-ray is not repeated prior to bronchoscopy or if the family and patient did not mention any history of bouts of coughing [24]. In our case, despite a long sharp nail having been expectorated, the patient showed no signs or symptoms of post expectoration complications and was sent home in a stable condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%