2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781315209067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Water–Food–Energy Nexus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this too is not without complication. The nexus approach has been criticised for lacking novelty and repackaging existing frameworks (Wichelns, 2017), for failing to produce a robust intellectual toolkit or provide proof that the nexus approach produces better resource management outcomes (Galaitsi and Huber-lee, 2018), and, like SES, for failing to critically engage with issues of power (Allouche et al, 2019). Additionally, the WEF Nexus is lacking practical application.…”
Section: A Novel Conceptual Interpretation For Ibwt Research and Practice: The Enhanced Water-energy-food Nexus Model (Ewef)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this too is not without complication. The nexus approach has been criticised for lacking novelty and repackaging existing frameworks (Wichelns, 2017), for failing to produce a robust intellectual toolkit or provide proof that the nexus approach produces better resource management outcomes (Galaitsi and Huber-lee, 2018), and, like SES, for failing to critically engage with issues of power (Allouche et al, 2019). Additionally, the WEF Nexus is lacking practical application.…”
Section: A Novel Conceptual Interpretation For Ibwt Research and Practice: The Enhanced Water-energy-food Nexus Model (Ewef)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As McGrane et al (2019) argue, there are two key challenges in implementing the WEF Nexus approach: the first is scale, and the challenge of identifying interdependencies across multiple spatial and temporal scales and between different actors; the second is data on which to found this analysis. Building on these challenges, Allouche et al (2019) Based on these critiques, we suggest that neither the SES nor WEF models is ideally suited for conceptualising the role of IBWT in our changing world. Both have limited utility to assist planners, water managers, or communities in assessing their viability and sustainability.…”
Section: A Novel Conceptual Interpretation For Ibwt Research and Practice: The Enhanced Water-energy-food Nexus Model (Ewef)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of its alphabetical or chronological order, there is a need to govern and manage inter and intra disciplinary synergy to ensure fundamental and survival rights of clean air, food, and water to our future generations. Governing the Nexus is probably one of the grand challenges of current time, as quoted by Jeremy Allouche et.al, explicitly explaining the reason for complexity in the management of so called 'nirvana concept' of nexus [19]. Author's justification on 'Nexus or Nexuses?'…”
Section: Managing Nexus Through Humus and Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population growth, natural resources depletion, and climate change are some of the critical factors considered when proposing a novel framework for addressing the threats posed to food, water, and energy security, and to develop innovative and efficient management systems that create greater synergies between these sectors [ 17 , 18 ]. Driven by these goals, the nexus is based on three principles: investing to sustain ecosystems services, creating more with less, and accelerating access by integrating the poorest [ 7 ].…”
Section: The Food–water–energy (Fwe) Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%