1997
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1997.9694767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The water‐holding capacity of fresh meat

Abstract: Several aspects of the water-holding capacity of fresh meat are discussed. After some compositional and structural characteristics of muscle are outlined, special attention is paid to post mortem muscle physiology and related mechanisms of fluid loss from meat. Finally, determinants of water-holding capacity (physiological factors, rearing conditions and processing factors) are described. From this review it can be concluded that the water-holding capacity and the subsequent drip loss are complex attributes of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
75
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water is the major meat constituent representing approximately 75% of the meat weight, and is an essential quality parameter, both for industry and final consumer. Low WHC values may cause problems in processed meats for the industry, and problems in the fresh meat appearance for the consumer (den Hertog-Meischke et al, 1997). The main factors that affect WHC and thus drip loss are: genotype (HAL and RN genes), pre-slaughter management and stunning methods (Claeys et al, 2001;Schäfer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Water is the major meat constituent representing approximately 75% of the meat weight, and is an essential quality parameter, both for industry and final consumer. Low WHC values may cause problems in processed meats for the industry, and problems in the fresh meat appearance for the consumer (den Hertog-Meischke et al, 1997). The main factors that affect WHC and thus drip loss are: genotype (HAL and RN genes), pre-slaughter management and stunning methods (Claeys et al, 2001;Schäfer et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factors that affect WHC and thus drip loss are: genotype (HAL and RN genes), pre-slaughter management and stunning methods (Claeys et al, 2001;Schäfer et al, 2002). According to den Hertog-Meischke et al (1997), other important feature that affects WHC is the predominant type of fiber in the muscle. Muscles with major amount of glycolytic fibers, also called white muscle fibers (fast contraction, type II A, anaerobic) have a lower WHC and a high pH drop rate after death (Lawrie, 2005), as well as a lower final pH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drop is caused by the conversion of glycogen to lactate post-mortem (25). In addition, the muscle form acto-myosin during rigor, leaving less space for water (26), and together with changes in the salt ion balance (27), these factors might explain the observed drop in WHC between pre and post rigor samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main factors that affected WHC, and thus drip loss, were: genotype (HAL and RN genes), pre-slaughter management, and stunning methods (Claeys et al, 2001;Schäfer et al, 2002). According to den Hertog-Meischke et al (1997), another important feature that affected WHC was the predominant type of fiber in the muscle. Muscles with more glycolytic fibers, also called white muscle fibers (fast contraction, type II A, anaerobic), had a lower WHC, a faster drop in pH after death (Lawrie, 2005), and a lower final pH.…”
Section: Meat Quality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%