1975
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100035170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The water intake of British Friesian cows on rations containing various forages

Abstract: The intake of drinking water of lactating British Friesian cows in 14 herds with a total of 840 animals was measured monthly from November to April inclusive. The intake of food, the air temperature and relative humidity were also recorded. The herds which mainly contained autumn-calved cows were managed under controlled commercial conditions. The average daily intake of drinking water was 49-9 (range 20-1 to 87-1) kg/cow for animals yielding an average of 16-8 kg milk/day in an environment with a mean tempera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
36
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, the new model (Equation 4) including milk yield, NaK, DM%, and DIM best predicted FWI of lactating dairy cows. The extant model in Castle and Thomas (1975) including only milk yield and DM% also performed well on independent data but had a larger RMSPE% (19.7%) than the RMSPE% of the new model (17.9%, Table 5). Predictions from the new model without DMI had small mean bias (1.2% of total bias, Table 5), although slope bias (28.6% of total bias) was quite notable (Figure 3).…”
Section: Models With Mineral Andmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistently, the new model (Equation 4) including milk yield, NaK, DM%, and DIM best predicted FWI of lactating dairy cows. The extant model in Castle and Thomas (1975) including only milk yield and DM% also performed well on independent data but had a larger RMSPE% (19.7%) than the RMSPE% of the new model (17.9%, Table 5). Predictions from the new model without DMI had small mean bias (1.2% of total bias, Table 5), although slope bias (28.6% of total bias) was quite notable (Figure 3).…”
Section: Models With Mineral Andmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Estimates of FWI may also be useful when attempting to match available resources to newly constructed facilities. To do so, several mathematical models have been published and may be used to predict FWI in dairy cattle (e.g., Castle and Thomas, 1975;Little and Shaw, 1978;Murphy et al, 1983;Stockdale and King, 1983;Dahlborn et al, 1998;Meyer et al, 2004;Cardot et al, 2008;Khelil-Arfa et al, 2012;Appuhamy et al, 2014b). The majority of extant models require DMI of individual cows as an input, which may not be routinely available in commercial dairy farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations