1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1973.tb04833.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Water Relations of Pinus sylvestris II. Comparative Field Studies of Water Potential and Relative Water Content

Abstract: Comparative field studies of water potential and relative water content in needles of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris L., were carried out in September‐October 1965, in June 1966 and in July‐August 1968. The sample trees were grafts, planted in 1946 and belonging to two clones, growing in close proximity and under the same environmental conditions. The main subject of the investigation was to determine whether differences in water potential and/or relative water content existed between these two clones, and if th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf water potential followed irradiance, air temperature and D both in cloudy and in clear weather (Figures 1 to 5), as found by other authors (Millar et al 1971, Hellkvist 1973a,b, Smart and Barrs 1973, Hellkvist et at. 1974, Hellkvist and Parsby 1976, Jarvis 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaf water potential followed irradiance, air temperature and D both in cloudy and in clear weather (Figures 1 to 5), as found by other authors (Millar et al 1971, Hellkvist 1973a,b, Smart and Barrs 1973, Hellkvist et at. 1974, Hellkvist and Parsby 1976, Jarvis 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…When the i//values presented in Figures 1 to 5 are plotted against D in clear weather (Figure 7), hysteresis can be seen, as previously shown in apple trees by Landsberg et at. (1975) and in pine trees (Hellkvist andParsby 1976, Jarvis 1976). This hysteresis occurs because i// also depends on irradiance (Jarvis 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for the response of growth to temperature rise may be due to the changes in the physical properties of tracheid walls. When, as a result of transpiration, the water sources in the tree stem are depleted, the xylem water potential decreases (Hellkvist 1973;Hellkvist and Parsby 1976;Kaibiyainen et al 1981;Kramer and Kozlowski 1979;Schulze et al 1985). According to Nonami and Boyer (1990a, b) low water potential is the main reason for the decrease in the expansion growth rate because of changes in such physical properties of walls as flexibility and hydraulic conductivity.…”
Section: Radial Diameter Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%