“…In spite of the tetrahedral {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNICs [(L) 2 Fe(NO) 2 ] − (L = thiolate, imidazolate) displaying EPR signal g = 2.03 [12][13][14][15][16][17][27][28][29], the distinct EPR signals exhibited by the squarepyramidal {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNIC [(6-Me 3 -TPA)Fe(NO) 2 ] + (g = 2.02) [25], the square-pyramidal {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNICs 2-iPr PDI (g = 2.015)/ 4-PyImiS (g = 2.018) and the six-coordinate {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNICs 1-TPA (g = 2.018)/[(1-MeIm) 2 (η 2 -ONO)Fe(NO) 2 ] (g = 2.013) [24] suggested that the EPR spectra in combination with IR ν NO spectra may serve as an efficient tool for the discrimination of the various geometrical {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNICs (Table 1) In the previous study on the reaction of {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNIC [(NO) 2 Fe(C 12 H 8 N) 2 ] − and incoming ligands ((S 2 CNMe 2 ) 2 , (PyPepS) 2 and P(C 6 H 3 -3-SiMe 3 -2-SH) 3 , respectively), the geometric structure and electronic structure of the intermediates dictating the release of [NO] + , ·NO and [NO] − , respectively, were demonstrated [12]. In this study, we further showed how the geometric structure of {Fe (NO) 9 DNICs, and modulated release of nitroxyl from DNICs. To our best knowledge, although no six-/fivecoordinate {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNIC was characterized in the biological study [1,38], the tendency of five-coordinate {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 DNICs to release nitroxyl may decipher that this type of DNICs derived from the classical {Fe(NO) 2 } 9 /{Fe(NO) 2 } 10 DNICs could be regarded as the storage/transport of nitroxyl regulated by the protein structure and charge of the immediate vicinity.…”