2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-011-9170-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Water Vapour Continuum: Brief History and Recent Developments

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Next, we calculated the OLR and albedo versus surface temperature for a range of CO 2 dry volume mixing ratios. Figure 3 shows (1) the OLR and (2) and (3) albedo for G-and M-star spectra, respectively, assuming Earth's gravity 7 Note that in Kopparapu et al (2013), it is stated that differences between the BPS and CKD continua (Shine et al 2012;Clough et al 1989) can cause up to 12 W m −2 difference in the OLR in the runaway limit. However, these authors later claim that their results closely correspond to Figure 4.37 in Pierrehumbert (2010), which was itself calculated using a continuum parameterization based on CKD.…”
Section: Variation Of Olr and Albedo With Surface Temperature And Co mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Next, we calculated the OLR and albedo versus surface temperature for a range of CO 2 dry volume mixing ratios. Figure 3 shows (1) the OLR and (2) and (3) albedo for G-and M-star spectra, respectively, assuming Earth's gravity 7 Note that in Kopparapu et al (2013), it is stated that differences between the BPS and CKD continua (Shine et al 2012;Clough et al 1989) can cause up to 12 W m −2 difference in the OLR in the runaway limit. However, these authors later claim that their results closely correspond to Figure 4.37 in Pierrehumbert (2010), which was itself calculated using a continuum parameterization based on CKD.…”
Section: Variation Of Olr and Albedo With Surface Temperature And Co mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the continuum absorption in these windows, and its dependence on pressure and temperature, is now much better observed and characterised, there remains a lively debate on the underlying physical causes of this continuum. The historical perspective underpinning the development of a theory of water vapour continuum absorption has led to recent developments and experimental campaigns leading to new insights into this uncertain aspect of how water vapour influences the flows of radiative energy through the atmosphere (Shine et al 2012). Although improved representation of the water vapour continuum is likely to reduce uncertainty in Earth's radiative energy budget only marginally, it may have implications for the retrieval of physical quantities from space and therefore how we observe Earth's climate system.…”
Section: Radiative Effects Of Water Vapourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another source of uncertainty is the so-called continuum absorption, especially due to water vapor. It is a spectrally less structured contribution dominating in window regions (e.g., Shine et al, 2012) which comprises two components: the self-continuum (attributed to H 2 O-H 2 O interactions) and the foreign continuum (attributed to H 2 O-air interactions). Although a definite continuum theory still does not exist, it seems that a consensus has been reached on the existence of the two possible physical processes contributing, namely (i) monomer contributions resulting from perturbations of the line shape due to (self-and foreign) pair interactions during molecular collisions and (ii) dimer contributions, i.e., absorption due to stable and/or metastable dimers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a drawback of laboratory measurements is that they are typically performed at least at room temperature or even heated, in order to detect the weak continuum absorption in the limited optical path length of the cells. Therefore, for climate and remote sensing applications an extrapolation of continuum coefficients to the lower atmospheric temperatures is required, which may lead to significant inaccuracies due to the uncertainty of the selfcontinuum temperature dependence (e.g., Shine et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%