1928
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100011919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods

Abstract: The paper is concerned with the practical determination of the characteristic values and functions of the wave equation of Schrodinger for a non-Coulomb central field, for which the potential is given as a function of the distance r from the nucleus.The method used is to integrate a modification of the equation outwards from initial conditions corresponding to a solution finite at r = 0, and inwards from initial conditions corresponding to a solution zero at r = ∞, with a trial value of the parameter (the ener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
692
0
41

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,478 publications
(734 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
692
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…(32). The additional factor of 2 on the contribution adds B + 2 C instead of 1 2 B + C, correcting the −C acquired by LPFD(+1) at O(T 3 ) to B + C. The corrective transformations not only continue to vanish for two electrons, but also mutually cancel for two holes, so both the 2-electron and 2-hole limiting cases remain correct. The dressing of the corrective transformations with q U matrices ensures that the size of the transformed amplitudes remains comparable to that of the untransformed amplitudes if the latter grow large.…”
Section: B a Comparison Of The Positive-definite Lpfd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(32). The additional factor of 2 on the contribution adds B + 2 C instead of 1 2 B + C, correcting the −C acquired by LPFD(+1) at O(T 3 ) to B + C. The corrective transformations not only continue to vanish for two electrons, but also mutually cancel for two holes, so both the 2-electron and 2-hole limiting cases remain correct. The dressing of the corrective transformations with q U matrices ensures that the size of the transformed amplitudes remains comparable to that of the untransformed amplitudes if the latter grow large.…”
Section: B a Comparison Of The Positive-definite Lpfd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this section we apply our symmetry-improved approach to the HF approximation [22][23][24] of the CJT effective action of a O(2) scalar model. We show that the predicted Goldstone boson is massless and the phase-transition is second order already in this approximation.…”
Section: The Hartree-fock Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a rigorous renormalization-group analysis [21] supports this result. In the first non-trivial truncation of the 2PI effective action, the Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation [22][23][24], one explicitly finds [10][11][12] that the Goldstone boson is massive and the phase transition is first order. Only in the large-N limit of the HF approximation, a consistent prediction is obtained [11,12], where the Goldstone boson is massless and the phase transition is second order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BO approximation accurately evaluating the correlation between electrons V ee remains a challenge for numerical calculations. To overcome this difficulty, the so-called Hartree-Fock (HF) SCF method is used [16,17] in order to include the effect of V ee approximately by considering each electron subject to an effective potential that is derived from the averaged charge distribution of all other electrons.…”
Section: Calculation Of Adiabatic Potential Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%