2000
DOI: 10.2979/hyp.2000.15.3.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Way Out West: Development and the Rhetoric of Mobility in Postmodern Feminist Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rights to travel, for example, are highly uneven and skewed even between a pair of countries (Timothy, 2001;Gogia, 2006). Many feminist theorists have argued that nomadic theory rests on a 'romantic reading of mobility', and that 'certain ways of seeing [arise] as a result of this privileging of cosmopolitan mobility' (Kaplan, 2006; see also Pritchard, 2000;Tsing, 2002). Ahmed, for example, critiques mobile forms of subjectivity and argues that the 'idealisation of movement, or transformation of movement into a fetish, depends upon the exclusion of others who are already positioned as not free in the same way' (Ahmed, 2004, p.152).…”
Section: Mobility Systems and Mobility Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rights to travel, for example, are highly uneven and skewed even between a pair of countries (Timothy, 2001;Gogia, 2006). Many feminist theorists have argued that nomadic theory rests on a 'romantic reading of mobility', and that 'certain ways of seeing [arise] as a result of this privileging of cosmopolitan mobility' (Kaplan, 2006; see also Pritchard, 2000;Tsing, 2002). Ahmed, for example, critiques mobile forms of subjectivity and argues that the 'idealisation of movement, or transformation of movement into a fetish, depends upon the exclusion of others who are already positioned as not free in the same way' (Ahmed, 2004, p.152).…”
Section: Mobility Systems and Mobility Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical point of view, the analysis is grounded in debates on gendered mobilities and tourism, and it aims at questioning the dichotomy between mobility/empowerment and stasis/disempowerment that has been discussed in various contributions in the field of gendered mobilities (cf. Cresswell and Uteng, 2008; Johnston, 2001; Pritchard, 2000; Rose, 1993). The thesis supported here is that, despite the abundant display of mobile and dynamic women in the promotional images of the cruise industry, it is possible to observe the persistence of various forms of a ‘masculine gaze’ (Mulvey, 1975; in the field of tourist studies, see Pritchard and Morgan, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%