2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2014.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weak Ekeland variational principle and fixed points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remarkable fact is that (with obvious set-valued modification) the proof of the theorem repeats word for word the classical Banach proof based on simple Picard's iterations. 3 In fact we prove a stronger result in Section 3 (Theorem 3.3). The idea of the improvement is the concept of a regularity horizon (introduced in [13] under the name "reach function") in the context of nonlocal regularity-see Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remarkable fact is that (with obvious set-valued modification) the proof of the theorem repeats word for word the classical Banach proof based on simple Picard's iterations. 3 In fact we prove a stronger result in Section 3 (Theorem 3.3). The idea of the improvement is the concept of a regularity horizon (introduced in [13] under the name "reach function") in the context of nonlocal regularity-see Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[4]) in existence theorems of metric analysis. As far as regularity properties (e.g., in covering theorems) 3 It seems appropriate to slightly rephrase [4, p. 12] and state that "in essence the whole history of the generalizations of 'the contraction mapping principle' reduces to finding new formulations from the standard process of proof." In [4] the authors spoke about the theorem of Lyusternik.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the next result, we give a version of the fixed-point theorems proved by Beer and Dontchev [14] (see Theorem 4) and Dontchev and Hager [15] in a strong b-metric space. Hence, we obtain a partial answer to the question raised by Kirk and Shahzad [8] (p. 128).…”
Section: Local Version Of the Covitz-nadler Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%