Studies of cities in globalisation now constitute a large and varied literature on changing urban geographies. It began with Peter Hall's (1966) pioneering study of leading cities of the post-Second World War economic boom. He developed a place-based synthesis of urban characteristics blending to constitute a specific "type" of city: world cities. According to Hall, what set world cities apart was their extensive relationality across borders: in his view and at the time, there was a marked difference between the likes of London and New York and "urban complexes like Osaka-Kobe, Chicago or Los Angeles (that) have regional (rather than) international significance" Hall's (1966, p. 9). Even though updated interpretations and surveys of world cities as a distinctive type of city still resonate in certain urbanist visions (Sigler, 2016), it has disappeared from the urban-geographical mainstream because it risks being inherently reductionist: most if not all cities now exhibit extensive relationality across borders, albeit in very different ways (Bunnell, 2015). Furthermore, as pointed out by Robinson (2005) andMcCann (2004), the reductionism engendered within envisaging world cities as a type of cities often contains western-centric and metro-centric elements that hamper its broader usefulness for making sense of cities in globalisation.