1990
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(90)90089-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wear properties of an SiC-whisker-reinforced aluminium composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And combining the surface morphology of both, we can obtain that the adhesive wear of the composites is less severe than that of the matrix. This conclusion is consistent with the results of Cao et al and Wang and Rack [8,9], who studied the wear properties of SiC-whisker and SiC-particulate reinforced aluminum composites. They found that the adhesive wear of composites was less severe than that of the matrix alloy.…”
Section: Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…And combining the surface morphology of both, we can obtain that the adhesive wear of the composites is less severe than that of the matrix. This conclusion is consistent with the results of Cao et al and Wang and Rack [8,9], who studied the wear properties of SiC-whisker and SiC-particulate reinforced aluminum composites. They found that the adhesive wear of composites was less severe than that of the matrix alloy.…”
Section: Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Contrary to these findings, some other investigators [13][14] have reported reduced wear rates of the composites where the matrix alloy contained hard particles such as SiC, Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , Si 3 N 4 and glass. Of all the techniques available for preparing the composite, the liquid metallurgy route is the most popular one as reported by Ramesh et.al [15].…”
Section: +contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The oxidation rate increased with increasing the sliding velocity as a function of sliding distance. This may be because of the rise in interface temperature which softened the nanocomposites [35,36]. The wear loss at sliding velocity of 2 m/s in steps of 250 m at various normal loads on the pin is plotted in Figure 9(c).…”
Section: Effect Of Sliding Distance On Wear Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%