2012
DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-11-00167.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weather Research and Forecasting Model's Community Variational/Ensemble Data Assimilation System: WRFDA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
304
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
304
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, this study designs a noncycling process, in which the first guesses are generated based on NCEP FNL data, while the first guesses in the cycling mode are typically obtained from short-range (typically 1-6 h) forecasts (Skamarock et al 2008, p.88). Fourth, the control variables (CVs) in the WRFDA system are streamfunction, unbalanced potential velocity, unbalanced temperature, unbalanced surface pressure, and pseudorelative humidity (Barker et al 2004). For all cases, the background error covariance was obtained by computing the average difference between 12-and 24-h forecasts valid at the same time using the National Meteorological Center (NMC) method (Parrish and Derber 1992).…”
Section: Model Configurations and Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Third, this study designs a noncycling process, in which the first guesses are generated based on NCEP FNL data, while the first guesses in the cycling mode are typically obtained from short-range (typically 1-6 h) forecasts (Skamarock et al 2008, p.88). Fourth, the control variables (CVs) in the WRFDA system are streamfunction, unbalanced potential velocity, unbalanced temperature, unbalanced surface pressure, and pseudorelative humidity (Barker et al 2004). For all cases, the background error covariance was obtained by computing the average difference between 12-and 24-h forecasts valid at the same time using the National Meteorological Center (NMC) method (Parrish and Derber 1992).…”
Section: Model Configurations and Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the growing interest in the WRFDA system and associated community-based developments, the WRFDA system has been equipped with extensive capability to assimilate various types of observations. The WRFDA system has DA options such as three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3D-Var), 4D-Var, and hybrid variational-ensemble DA that permit assimilating a wide range of observations including in situ measurements, Doppler radar reflectivity, precipitation, and radiances (Barker et al 2012;Wang et al 2013). For example, the 3D-Var assimilation of conventional ground-based data and radiance observations has been used for improving precipitation forecasts at various spatial resolutions (Ha et al 2011;Ha and Lee 2012;Hsiao et al 2012;Liu et al 2012;Routray et al 2010;Schwartz et al 2012;Xu and Powell 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The WRF data assimilation (WRFDA) system used in this study is a variational data assimilation system formulated in grid-point space (Barker et al 2012). In this system, U h is a recursive filter transform to impose the horizontal correlations, U v is the application of vertical correlations through empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) of analysis control variables, and U p changes the analysis control variables to model state variables using the statistical balance relationship.…”
Section: Variational Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%