2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119407270.ch27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wedge‐Loaded Double Cantilever Beam Test: A Friction Based Method for Measuring Interlaminar Fracutre Properties in Ceramic Matrix Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equilibrium condition of the vertical forces acting on the wedge, assuming symmetry, yields an equation for F x which is the mouth opening load (the load required to initiate and propagate an interlaminar crack) as follows: Fnormalx=P(cosαμsinαfalse)2(sinα+μcosα)To calculate the mouth opening load from Equation , the coefficient of friction between the specimen and the wedge should be determined. The coefficient of friction, μ , between SiC/SiC and Si 3 N 4 (wedge material) was measured in a previous work (using pin on disk) and was found to be 0.26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equilibrium condition of the vertical forces acting on the wedge, assuming symmetry, yields an equation for F x which is the mouth opening load (the load required to initiate and propagate an interlaminar crack) as follows: Fnormalx=P(cosαμsinαfalse)2(sinα+μcosα)To calculate the mouth opening load from Equation , the coefficient of friction between the specimen and the wedge should be determined. The coefficient of friction, μ , between SiC/SiC and Si 3 N 4 (wedge material) was measured in a previous work (using pin on disk) and was found to be 0.26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the wedge test, one may have to account for friction effects between the wedge and the specimen, which might require an additional procedure for determining the coefficient of friction . Also, alignment (specifically, specimen notch alignment in respect to the wedge) requires more attention in the wedge‐loaded DCB test compared to the traditional DCB.…”
Section: Traditional Dcb Vs Wedge‐loaded Dcb: Merits and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%