1978
DOI: 10.2307/1936645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Weibull Distribution: A New Method of Summarizing Survivorship Data

Abstract: Survivorship data can be effectively summarized using the shape and scale parameters of the Weibull frequency distribution. The shape parameter controls the rate of change of the age—specific mortality rate and, therefore, the general form of the survivorship curve. Estimates of shape and scale parameters and their confidence intervals can be easily calculated and used to compare survivorship curves of different populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
202
0
10

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
202
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Power analysis (Cohen 1988) shows that with our sample size and variation in survival, we had a 95% chance of detecting a correlation coe¤cient between o¡spring survival and mating success of as little as 0.26. To put this in context, the median r-value between measures of o¡spring survival and sire attractiveness reported by ¢eld studies claiming good-genes e¡ects is 0.47 (von Schantz et al 1989;Norris 1993;Petrie 1994;Hasselquist et al 1996;Sheldon et al 1997); the equivalent ¢gure from the laboratory is 0.65 (Taylor et al 1987;Reynolds & Gross 1654 (Pinder et al 1978), after Crawley (1993. c After correcting for multiple tests of the same hypothesis (Rice 1989), this value remained signi¢cant at p50.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power analysis (Cohen 1988) shows that with our sample size and variation in survival, we had a 95% chance of detecting a correlation coe¤cient between o¡spring survival and mating success of as little as 0.26. To put this in context, the median r-value between measures of o¡spring survival and sire attractiveness reported by ¢eld studies claiming good-genes e¡ects is 0.47 (von Schantz et al 1989;Norris 1993;Petrie 1994;Hasselquist et al 1996;Sheldon et al 1997); the equivalent ¢gure from the laboratory is 0.65 (Taylor et al 1987;Reynolds & Gross 1654 (Pinder et al 1978), after Crawley (1993. c After correcting for multiple tests of the same hypothesis (Rice 1989), this value remained signi¢cant at p50.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weibull frequency distribution was used to describe the age-specific survival of all individuals (Pinder et al, 1978): Deevey, 1947) where S p (t) represents the probability of surviving to a given age, bis the parameter that describes the scale, c is shape of the curve and t is time. The shape parameters c>1, c=1 and c<1 correspond to type I, II and III survivorship curves, respectively (Deevey, 1947;Pinder et al, 1978).…”
Section: Life Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se a população considerada tem dependência de sobrevivência do tipo I, a taxa de mortalidade aumenta com o tempo e α > 1; para a dependência de sobrevivência do tipo II, a taxa de mortalidade é constante e, então, á será aproximadamente 1; o tipo III implica em α < 1, o que significa que a taxa de mortalidade decresce com o tempo (Pinder et al 1978).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified