We experimentally investigated the ¢tness consequences of female mate choice in order to test the relative importance of three competing but non-exclusive hypotheses for the maintenance of pronounced female mating preferences on leks: that females bene¢t directly; that they gain indirect Fisherian bene¢ts by producing more attractive sons; or that they bene¢t indirectly because preferred males possess`good genes' that confer increased viability on their sons and daughters. We allowed lekking female sand£ies, Lutzomyia longipalpis, to choose between males of varying attractiveness to females, and monitored the consequences for their own survival and reproductive success as well as for their o¡spring. In contrast to the predictions of the direct-bene¢ts model, we found no clear sire e¡ect on the fecundity or survival of the females themselves; females mating with more attractive males did survive longer after oviposition, but never long enough to undertake a second batch of egg laying. We also found no evidence that females gained good-genes bene¢ts in terms of enhanced o¡spring survival. However, we did ¢nd that generally attractive males fathered sons who were then chosen when they in turn formed leks. Although not completely precluding other bene¢ts, our results indicate that Fisherian bene¢ts are at least partly responsible for maintaining female choice at L. longipalpis leks. These ¢ndings indicate the importance of testing all putative bene¢ts concurrently in exploring the maintenance of female mate choice.