2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weight and breadth of evidence: Some reflections on the strengths of international education and development research

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is part of the on-going discussion on the role of research in the field of international education and development and contributes to broadening approaches and methodological traditions, as suggested by McGrath (2013). Promoting the use of research methods by which the stakeholders' voices are included in the educational development dialogue adds valuable insights gleaned from qualitative research to the generally descriptive reports on changes, contextualizes educational development and enhances stakeholder involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This paper is part of the on-going discussion on the role of research in the field of international education and development and contributes to broadening approaches and methodological traditions, as suggested by McGrath (2013). Promoting the use of research methods by which the stakeholders' voices are included in the educational development dialogue adds valuable insights gleaned from qualitative research to the generally descriptive reports on changes, contextualizes educational development and enhances stakeholder involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%