2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The weighted Groundwater Health Index (wGHI) by Korbel and Hose (2017) in European groundwater bodies in nitrate vulnerable zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, almost all the studies we examined primarily concerned biomass and did so on many organisms belonging to 16 taxa afferent to the lake meiofauna. In lotic environments, studies on the size-spectrum of the meiofauna, i.e., displaying of biomass in logarithmical intervals of body size, are common (e.g., [43]), while in groundwater [14,44] and in lentic habitats they are much less considered. A further critical aspect is that, as regards lake meiofauna, only a few studies incorporated the species-specific biomass distribution at assemblage-and community-level and their variation within and among ecosystems (e.g., [23]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, almost all the studies we examined primarily concerned biomass and did so on many organisms belonging to 16 taxa afferent to the lake meiofauna. In lotic environments, studies on the size-spectrum of the meiofauna, i.e., displaying of biomass in logarithmical intervals of body size, are common (e.g., [43]), while in groundwater [14,44] and in lentic habitats they are much less considered. A further critical aspect is that, as regards lake meiofauna, only a few studies incorporated the species-specific biomass distribution at assemblage-and community-level and their variation within and among ecosystems (e.g., [23]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of this ‘Groundwater Health Index’ (GHI) framework was triggered by Australian water management policies and the heavy reliance on groundwater from irrigation‐based industries. Methods to measure groundwater health and monitor groundwater ecosystems continue to be refined and developed (di Lorenzo, Fiasca, di Camillo, et al, 2020; Fillinger et al, 2019; Griebler, Stein, et al, 2014; Koch et al, 2021; Korbel & Hose, 2017), with these management tools being used by governments to monitor groundwater health (e.g. report Korbel, Greenfield, & Hose, 2022).…”
Section: Historical Evolution Of Groundwater Fauna Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GHI was improved in 2017 (Korbel & Hose, 2017) where its use was expanded into the Namoi and Macquarie catchment (Korbel & Hose, 2017) and is currently being utilised by the NSW government to monitor groundwater health in several of the Murray Darling sub‐catchments (NSW Department of Planning and Environment, 2022) and has been adapted for Europe (e.g. di Lorenzo, Fiasca, di Camillo, et al, 2020) and the Philippines (Magbanua, 2022).…”
Section: Global Groundwater Fauna Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any disturbances that do not affect microbes in terms of biomass standing stock, growth and physiological activity cannot be detected. Such disturbances may include the presence of pollutants in trace concentrations (Meckenstock et al 2015) or moderate temperature alterations (Griebler et al 2016). Certain limitations in this regard may indeed be overcome by including fluorescence spectroscopy data of DOM in the analysis, which may detect traces of organic pollutants under certain conditions (Wasswa et al 2019).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%