2022
DOI: 10.21034/sr.635
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Welfare Effects of Encouraging Rural-Urban Migration

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and includes (i) an iceberg cost that reduces the non-agricultural wage by a fraction i in each period, and (ii) a fixed cost that reduces the wage in the destination sector by a fraction f in periods when a change of sector takes place. The iceberg cost can be interpreted as an amenity cost -as in Lagakos et al (2019) -or as any other flow cost associated with leaving the agricultural sector, as, for example, the exclusion from risk-sharing communities (Munshi and Rosenzweig, 2016;Morten, 2019). The fixed cost can be interpreted as a onetime mobility cost, which might be driven by actual moving expenses (if a geographical move is necessary to change sector) or any other associated cost, such as retraining, idle time in between jobs, or one-time emotional costs.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and includes (i) an iceberg cost that reduces the non-agricultural wage by a fraction i in each period, and (ii) a fixed cost that reduces the wage in the destination sector by a fraction f in periods when a change of sector takes place. The iceberg cost can be interpreted as an amenity cost -as in Lagakos et al (2019) -or as any other flow cost associated with leaving the agricultural sector, as, for example, the exclusion from risk-sharing communities (Munshi and Rosenzweig, 2016;Morten, 2019). The fixed cost can be interpreted as a onetime mobility cost, which might be driven by actual moving expenses (if a geographical move is necessary to change sector) or any other associated cost, such as retraining, idle time in between jobs, or one-time emotional costs.…”
Section: Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hsieh et al (2019) also exploit year and cohort effects to calibrate a model of allocation of talent; compared to their work, we focus on a simpler framework that allows us to analytically consider fixed-cost-type frictions, which turn out to be crucial to correctly identify the role of changes in the supply of agricultural workers. In emphasizing the importance of comparative advantage, our work also relates to Lagakos and Waugh (2013), Young (2013) and Nakamura et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working with models of spatial equilibrium with dynamics is difficult, but is an active area of research (e.g., Balboni 2019;Caliendo, Dvorkin, and Parro 2019;and Ahlfeldt, Bald, Roth and Seidel 2019). Finally there are other considerations of incomplete markets and risk raised by the Bangladesh experiments conducted in the context of round trip, or seasonal migration, which also find high disutility or lack of affinity from migration, as reviewed in Lagakos, Mobarak, and Waugh (2018).…”
Section: The Roback Model Meets Current Patterns Of Urbanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in this vein, Brooks and Donovan (Forthcoming) flush out the general-equilibrium effects of improved transportation infrastructure on rural farmers starting with reduced-form evidence on the effects of rural bridge building. Using a similar methodology, Lagakos, Mobarak, and Waugh (2020) quantify the aggregate effects of subsides to rural-urban migration, and Akcigit, Alp, and Peters (Forthcoming) infer the general equilibrium effects of improving managerial capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%