1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1996(93)90064-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The welfare effects of repealing the U.S. Offshore Assembly Provision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the United States imports products that are assembled abroad, the OAP exempts from duty that portion of the US.imported final product that can be attributed to U.S. components. The general finding in this area, as demonstrated by Finger (1976) and Mendez (1993), is that the OAP has increased the activity of US. parts industries at the same time that it has reduced the activities of U.S.…”
Section: Trends In Foreign Trade Zone Usage By Automobile Producersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When the United States imports products that are assembled abroad, the OAP exempts from duty that portion of the US.imported final product that can be attributed to U.S. components. The general finding in this area, as demonstrated by Finger (1976) and Mendez (1993), is that the OAP has increased the activity of US. parts industries at the same time that it has reduced the activities of U.S.…”
Section: Trends In Foreign Trade Zone Usage By Automobile Producersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The model was selected because it is more general than that of Baldwin and Murray (1977) but still tractable. More sophisticated models, such as that of Mendez (1993), could not be used because data on US shipments are not sufficiently disaggregated. 2 The model implicitly assumes that domestic supply is perfectly elastic, so that the price of the domestically produced good is constant.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elasticity of substitution between US apparel imports from different sources is assumed to lie between 3 and 4.5. Mendez (1993) calculates a value of about 4.5 for the elasticity of substitution and this value is adopted as an upper bound. The USITC (1992) uses values ranging from 0.9 to 3 but because the elasticity of import demand is estimated to lie between 1.5 and 2.5, it is unlikely that the elasticity of substitution would be much less than 3.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… The traditional literature on vertical integration uses a Leontieff production structure. See Greenhut and Ohta (1979) or Mendez (1993) for an application to OAP. Yi (2003) creates a more elaborate three‐ stage production structure. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%