2009
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847420565.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The well-connected communityA networking approach to community development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
86
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While some authors associate this with a sense of loss, recovery and continuation of tradition (Delanty 2010), others construct contemporary communities as complex, dynamic, contingent and networked approaches to maintaining a sense of ''local'' and ''connectedness'' within an increasingly impersonal and globalising world (Crow et al 2002;Gilchrist 2009). In addressing this latter construct, Block (2008) argues that people increasingly ''experience'' community rather than belong to it.…”
Section: Spaces and Times As Organising Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some authors associate this with a sense of loss, recovery and continuation of tradition (Delanty 2010), others construct contemporary communities as complex, dynamic, contingent and networked approaches to maintaining a sense of ''local'' and ''connectedness'' within an increasingly impersonal and globalising world (Crow et al 2002;Gilchrist 2009). In addressing this latter construct, Block (2008) argues that people increasingly ''experience'' community rather than belong to it.…”
Section: Spaces and Times As Organising Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a study on social capital in Britain suggests that there is a class factor, with middleclass people being more likely to be members of voluntarily or civic associations while working class households enjoy higher levels of informal sociability (Christ, 2009). The geographical setting either landed or multi-storey housing areas as well as a community with socioeconomic diversity can influence the degree of social capital.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic characteristics, a 5-item scale of cultural tourism benefits modified from prior studies [19,22,26,[40][41][42], a 6-item scale of cognitive capital, a 6-item scale of structural capital, a 6-item scale of relational capital based on social capital literature [15,16,34,[43][44][45], and a 4-item scale of attitudes toward aboriginal cultural tourism [15,19,22,44]. A pilot test with 50 questionnaires was conducted in the study area to evaluate the reliability and validity of the measurement scales.…”
Section: Measurement Instrument and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%