“…This assemblage of reworked phosphoclasts includes apparent cell clusters that have been variously interpreted as metazoan diapause-stage embryos, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, and protists (Bailey, Joye, Kalanetra, Flood, & Corsetti, 2007;Cunningham et al, 2011;Huldtgren et al, 2011;Xiao, Zhang, & Knoll, 1998;Yin et al, 2007). Some characteristics claimed to represent evidence of animal affinities, including reductive cell division, Y-shaped cell junctions, and the enrobement of some specimens in textured enveloping precipitates, are not diagnostic characteristics (Cunningham, Vargas, Yin, Bengtson, & Donoghue, 2017) even if they do represent primary biological features. In addition, it is now known that some features initially interpreted as biological in origin, may instead result from non-biological processes, including those that result from diagenetic changes following initial authigenic mineral precipitation (Bengtson & Budd, 2004;Cunningham et al, 2012).…”