1982
DOI: 10.1080/14443058209386845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Western Australian government and Australian tarriff policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resource-rich States have argued that they are effectively subsidizing the inefficient producers of highly protected goods in the southeast States: consumers in the periphery ensure a net flow of tariff benefits to the 'core' States. However, as Warhurst (1982) has shown, the Western Australian government has played a double game; while denouncing protection for the southeast, it has sought protection for its own small secondary industries when their interests seemed under threat. Indeed, State governments have increasingly become advocates for their local industries in hearings conducted by the IAC (Warhurst 1980).…”
Section: (Industries Assistance Commission 1980 A7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resource-rich States have argued that they are effectively subsidizing the inefficient producers of highly protected goods in the southeast States: consumers in the periphery ensure a net flow of tariff benefits to the 'core' States. However, as Warhurst (1982) has shown, the Western Australian government has played a double game; while denouncing protection for the southeast, it has sought protection for its own small secondary industries when their interests seemed under threat. Indeed, State governments have increasingly become advocates for their local industries in hearings conducted by the IAC (Warhurst 1980).…”
Section: (Industries Assistance Commission 1980 A7)mentioning
confidence: 99%