2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wettability and interface thermal resistance of copper/graphite system with an addition of chromium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be easily broken during sliding, making the contiguous layers form a tribolayer on the contact surfaces that lowers the metallic contact area and does not significantly increase electric contact resistance (Zhan et al, 2003, 2004; Braunovic et al, 2010; Esezobor et al, 2011; Rajkumar et al, 2013). As a result several graphite-fiber and graphite-particulate copper reinforced composites that are mainly produced by the powder technology route (Tao et al, 2011) are commercially used as sliding contacts, industrial bearings and electric motor, and generator brushes (Zhan et al, 2003; Braunovic et al, 2010; Rajkumar et al, 2013). However, there are still two problems that hinder development and further application of advanced copper/graphite composites (Tao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be easily broken during sliding, making the contiguous layers form a tribolayer on the contact surfaces that lowers the metallic contact area and does not significantly increase electric contact resistance (Zhan et al, 2003, 2004; Braunovic et al, 2010; Esezobor et al, 2011; Rajkumar et al, 2013). As a result several graphite-fiber and graphite-particulate copper reinforced composites that are mainly produced by the powder technology route (Tao et al, 2011) are commercially used as sliding contacts, industrial bearings and electric motor, and generator brushes (Zhan et al, 2003; Braunovic et al, 2010; Rajkumar et al, 2013). However, there are still two problems that hinder development and further application of advanced copper/graphite composites (Tao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result several graphite-fiber and graphite-particulate copper reinforced composites that are mainly produced by the powder technology route (Tao et al, 2011) are commercially used as sliding contacts, industrial bearings and electric motor, and generator brushes (Zhan et al, 2003; Braunovic et al, 2010; Rajkumar et al, 2013). However, there are still two problems that hinder development and further application of advanced copper/graphite composites (Tao et al, 2011). The low affinity between copper and graphite results in weak interfaces, with deleterious effects upon mechanical, thermal, and electric properties that limit performance and service life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the coating thickness is very consistent, non-uniform diffusion of copper into the silver layer can be avoided. This is very critical because heterogeneity in the copper diffusion can cause undesirable thermal stress at high temperature [17,18]. Figure 6 shows the micrographs of the composites at 4wt.% Ag and 55vol.% CF.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge, carbide compounds were introduced as bonding interfaces. Molybdenum carbide, titanium carbide and boron carbide bond well to the carbon fibres thus improve the overall CTE of the composites [4][5][6][7][8][9]. But these carbides also have some disadvantages due to their low thermal conductivity and high density [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods applicable to dispersed composites, like the thermal wave method proposed by Garnier [11], require complicated sample preparation and sophisticated experimental setup. For that reason, many researchers turned to indirect methods of evaluation of filler-matrix ITR, in which filler-matrix bond is recreated in larger scale [19,20] or with basic cylindrical geometry [10]. The downside of such approaches is the uncertainty of proper recreation of contact pressures, interfacial voids and other defects that are present in the actual composites, which have great influence on the value of ITR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%