2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1332-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The whereabouts of visual attention: Involuntary attentional bias toward the default gaze direction

Abstract: This study proposed and verified a new hypothesis on the relationship between gaze direction and visual attention: attentional bias by default gaze direction based on eye-head coordination. We conducted a target identification task in which visual stimuli appeared briefly to the left and right of a fixation cross. In Experiment 1, the direction of the participant's head (aligned with the body) was manipulated to the left, front, or right relative to a central fixation point. In Experiment 2, head direction was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, because the central location is acoustically the most unfavorable, it may be the case that spatially aligned visual attention is especially important in that case. It is also possible that lateral eye movements strongly engage the visual spatial attention system, leading to interference if auditory attention is focused elsewhere, whereas frontal fixation leaves the visual system in a default state (Nakashima & Kumada, 2017) that is less likely to cause interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, because the central location is acoustically the most unfavorable, it may be the case that spatially aligned visual attention is especially important in that case. It is also possible that lateral eye movements strongly engage the visual spatial attention system, leading to interference if auditory attention is focused elsewhere, whereas frontal fixation leaves the visual system in a default state (Nakashima & Kumada, 2017) that is less likely to cause interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of body parts (the own body representation) modulates human visual perception, biasing visual attention, even if their position is task irrelevant (e.g., Garza, Strom, Wright, Roberts, & Reed, 2013;Nakashima & Kumada, 2017). Further, visual perception is influenced by the position of a hand tool that one holds (e.g., Reed, Betz, Garza, & Roberts, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived fatigue was assessed using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (maximal fatigue and exhaustion), which captures momentary fatigue and is validated for physical activity (Murray and Hunfalvay, 2017). Perceived exertion was assessed with the Borg scale which ranges from 6 (no exertion) to 20 (maximal exertion) (Nakashima and Kumada, 2017) and captures participants' perception of exercise intensity.…”
Section: Perceived Fatigue and Exertionmentioning
confidence: 99%