Handbook of Research on Special Education Teacher Preparation
DOI: 10.4324/9780203817032.ch27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Wicked Question” of Teacher Education Effects and What to Do About It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial adoption of the voluntary standards occurred in 49 states (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], 2010); however, seven states have since rescinded their adoption of CCSS and have worked to adopt their own standards (CCSS Initiative, 2016). Although a number of researchers have acknowledged a lack of specificity in the CCSS regarding their implementation with students with disabilities (Haager & Vaughn, 2013; Leko et al, 2015), it is clear that today’s special education teachers need extensive knowledge of content as well as the interventions, assessments, and technology needed to support students with disabilities in meeting rigorous standards (Leko et al, 2015; Lignugaris-Kraft, Sindelar, McCray, & Kimerling, 2014). Special educators must also demonstrate proficiency with respect to general teaching standards such as those articulated by the CCSSO through its Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) CCSSO, 2011); standards more specific to special education, such as those articulated by the Council for Exceptional Children; and state licensure requirements.…”
Section: The Context: Historical Political and Social Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial adoption of the voluntary standards occurred in 49 states (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], 2010); however, seven states have since rescinded their adoption of CCSS and have worked to adopt their own standards (CCSS Initiative, 2016). Although a number of researchers have acknowledged a lack of specificity in the CCSS regarding their implementation with students with disabilities (Haager & Vaughn, 2013; Leko et al, 2015), it is clear that today’s special education teachers need extensive knowledge of content as well as the interventions, assessments, and technology needed to support students with disabilities in meeting rigorous standards (Leko et al, 2015; Lignugaris-Kraft, Sindelar, McCray, & Kimerling, 2014). Special educators must also demonstrate proficiency with respect to general teaching standards such as those articulated by the CCSSO through its Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) CCSSO, 2011); standards more specific to special education, such as those articulated by the Council for Exceptional Children; and state licensure requirements.…”
Section: The Context: Historical Political and Social Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many who applaud the last decade of policy changes and its call for increased collaboration and integration with general education, others remind us of the need to revisit the definition of special education to consider how its essential principles and core activities contrast with those of general education (Lignugaris-Kraft et al, 2014; Pullen & Hallahan, 2015). In considering ways to frame the current understanding of the roles of special educators, it may be helpful to return to the core definition of special education as stated in the original federal regulations for IDEA:Special education means specially designed instruction , at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability .…”
Section: Tensions In the Field: Roles Of Pk-12 Special Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linking teacher preparation to candidate practice and their practice to student learning is a “wicked” educational problem (Lignugaris-Kraft, Sindelar, McCray, & Kimerling, 2014). The problem is compounded by a dearth of rigorous empirical studies in this area (Goe & Coggshall, 2007).…”
Section: Discussion: Implementation Adaptation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are clearly more unanswered than answered questions about preparing highly qualified teachers to meet the needs of all children in inclusive settings. These questions, in turn, are set against a backdrop of even more complex, indeed "wicked problems," confronting P-12 and teacher education today (Lignugaris/Kraft, Sindelar, McCray, & Kimerling, 2014). We examined the potential roles that school-university partnerships may play in addressing some unanswered questions, cautioned about the dearth of rigorous research, and provided a few partnership exemplars derived from the funded project.…”
Section: Future Directions For Partnership Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%