2022
DOI: 10.1108/jd-01-2022-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The width and depth of literacies for tackling the COVID-19 infodemic

Abstract: PurposeA wide choice of varied information and data-based tools is reviewed in order to determine their ability treating symptoms of the COVID-19 infodemic. Several literacies and derived literacies, presumably having the ability to fulfil these roles are enumerated. There is also a review of the impact of applying deconstruction, understanding, and anticipation as well as of tools for mitigating overload phenomena, and communication overload.Design/methodology/approachThe article reviews literacies deemed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reviewed publications suffer from some shortcomings, such as the absence of previous supporting publications, a scarcity of critical spirit in relation to DL, and infrequent definition of specific disciplinary frameworks, among others, some avenues of discussion can be surmised. Gaps have been identified linked to the limitations of general frameworks for addressing DL in specialized disciplines and settings (Špiranec et al, 2019;O'Neill, 2019;Koltay, 2023;Valverde et al, 2022). In fact, five articles using the ACRL framework as a reference complement it with more specific ones: geospatial information (Appel, 2020), business data (Condon;Pothier, 2022), digital humanities (Locke, 2017), maps (Rutkowski; Williams, 2020), and GIS (Widener; Reese, 2016).…”
Section: Evidence and Gaps In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reviewed publications suffer from some shortcomings, such as the absence of previous supporting publications, a scarcity of critical spirit in relation to DL, and infrequent definition of specific disciplinary frameworks, among others, some avenues of discussion can be surmised. Gaps have been identified linked to the limitations of general frameworks for addressing DL in specialized disciplines and settings (Špiranec et al, 2019;O'Neill, 2019;Koltay, 2023;Valverde et al, 2022). In fact, five articles using the ACRL framework as a reference complement it with more specific ones: geospatial information (Appel, 2020), business data (Condon;Pothier, 2022), digital humanities (Locke, 2017), maps (Rutkowski; Williams, 2020), and GIS (Widener; Reese, 2016).…”
Section: Evidence and Gaps In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%