Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing 2017
DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wikipedia Adventure

Abstract: Integrating new users into a community with complex norms presents a challenge for peer production projects like Wikipedia. We present The Wikipedia Adventure (TWA): an interactive tutorial that offers a structured and gamified introduction to Wikipedia. In addition to describing the design of the system, we present two empirical evaluations. First, we report on a survey of users, who responded very positively to the tutorial. Second, we report results from a largescale invitation-based field experiment that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior work has considered how a specific subset of people learn (e.g., young adults), how people learn a specific subject, or how people use a particular resource for learning [27,36,50,54]. Yet, little is known about the full ecosystem of what adults learn about online and what educational resources they use to do so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has considered how a specific subset of people learn (e.g., young adults), how people learn a specific subject, or how people use a particular resource for learning [27,36,50,54]. Yet, little is known about the full ecosystem of what adults learn about online and what educational resources they use to do so.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fully automated, the Wikipedia Adventure was designed to provide both comprehensive socialization and an impression of personalization through the use of self-guided interactive tutorials, realistic training scenarios, levels and badges, and a light, playful tone. Although the Wikipedia Adventure was widely used and rated favorably by the editors who played along, a controlled study of the system did not show any long-term impact [20]. The evaluation of the Wikipedia Adventure is notable because it was the first study of new editor onboarding on Wikipedia to combine an analysis of long-term retention impacts with a randomized controlled study design-a model we follow in our current study.…”
Section: Wikimedia Foundation Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our analysis drew heavily from a body of research in econometrics that has used natural experiments to establish causality in observational data where researchers have traditionally been limited to making claims about correlation [3,28]. Recently HCI researchers have begun analyzing natural experiments as well [29]. Borrowing terminology from randomized controlled experiments in medicine, analyses of natural experiments typically describe their key independent variable as "the treatment."…”
Section: Analytic Planmentioning
confidence: 99%