2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0519-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The wild side of plant microbiomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
146
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
146
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, the ‘direction’ of this bacterial enrichment is difficult to reconcile with the eco-geographic adaptation of wild barleys and, in particular, the fact that Actinobacteria are more tolerant to arid conditions 34 and, consequently, more abundant in desert vs. non-desert soils 35 . However, the enrichment of Actinobacteria in modern crops compared to ancestral relatives has recently emerged as a distinctive feature of the microbiota of multiple plant species 36 . Although the ecological significance of this trait of the domesticated microbiota remains to be fully elucidated, studies conducted in rice 37 and other grasses, including barley 38 , indicate a relationship between drought stress and Actinobacteria enrichments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, the ‘direction’ of this bacterial enrichment is difficult to reconcile with the eco-geographic adaptation of wild barleys and, in particular, the fact that Actinobacteria are more tolerant to arid conditions 34 and, consequently, more abundant in desert vs. non-desert soils 35 . However, the enrichment of Actinobacteria in modern crops compared to ancestral relatives has recently emerged as a distinctive feature of the microbiota of multiple plant species 36 . Although the ecological significance of this trait of the domesticated microbiota remains to be fully elucidated, studies conducted in rice 37 and other grasses, including barley 38 , indicate a relationship between drought stress and Actinobacteria enrichments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing wild and modern crop genotypes, few studies have addressed the effect of domestication in altering the composition and structure of the plant-associated bacterial and fungal microbiota, (recently reviewed in Hassani et al 2019; Escudero-Martinez et al 2019; Cordovez et al 2019). Depending on the crop species, plant domestication has resulted in microbial diversity reduction (Zachow et al 2014), reduced symbiotic interactions (Kiers et al 2007) or depletion of a microbial phylogroup (Pérez-Jaramillo et al 2018). While genetic diversity of crop species is reduced at a population level, we still lack insight why individual crop plants assemble less diverse microbial communities compared to their wild relatives.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude by considering how this study links to the call for greater research effort on microbiomes in natural populations of animals and plants (Hird, 2017;Perez-Jaramillo, Carrion, Hollander, & Raaijmakers, 2018). The tight environmental controls and simplifying conditions of laboratory studies facilitate the study of fundamental mechanisms, but there is increasing evidence that some important processes and interactions are not displayed under laboratory conditions Ericsson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Insights Into Microbiomes Of Wild Animalsmentioning
confidence: 84%