‘The will to not be empowered (according to your rules)’: Resistance in Finnish participatory social policy

Abstract

Participation has increasingly become a means and an end for successful and ‘empowering’ social policy. Building on previous governmentality critiques of participatory initiatives, this article investigates practices of resistance in the context of Finnish participatory social policy. I adopt a Foucauldian counter-conducts approach as my lens to study critical speech as a form of resistance in initiatives that invite marginalised people as ‘experts-by-experience’ in social welfare organisations. I illustrate how practices of governing and resistance are intertwined and mutually dependent in a much subtler and more practical manner than allows the often-used analytical dichotomy between dominance and empowerment. As an example, I show how the projects’ attempts to co-opt the participants’ critical speech may also serve as the basis for their subversive self-making and means of ‘being differently’.

Narratives of experts by experience: A journey from criminal to expert

“…In recent years, there has been a growing interest not only in the causes of crime, but also in how and why people desist from crime (Paternoster et al, 2016;Bersani & Doherty, 2018). Desistance should not be seen as an event or a state of being, but rather as a process or an ongoing work in progress (McNeill & Maruna, 2008). McNeill and Maruna (2008) state that desistance from crime is a fairly straightforward concept, but it has been difficult to use in the context of criminology research, as 'to cease and desist' something means giving it up permanently and not engaging in it ever again.…”

COVID-19-pandemian aiheuttaman poikkeustilanteen merkitys kokemusasiantuntijatoiminnalle mielenterveystyössä

“…Kokemusasiantuntijatoimintaan kohdistuneessa tutkimuksessa on tarkasteltu toiminnan merkitystä sosiaali-ja terveyspalveluissa ja niiden kehittämisessä (24)(25)(26)(27), kokemusasiantuntijoiden ja ammattilaisten yhteistyötä sairaalaorganisaatioissa ja mielenterveyspalveluissa (18,(28)(29)(30) sekä kokemusasiantuntijuuden merkitystä osallisuuden mahdollistajana ja toisaalta osallistamispolitiikan välineenä (31)(32)(33). Kokemusasiantuntijatoiminnan vaikutuksia tarkastelleet tutkimukset osoittavat, että toiminta edistää asiakkaan elämänhallintaa, hyvinvoinnin ylläpitämistä ja tyytyväisyyttä elämään (34,35), kohentaa itseluottamusta ja elämänlaatua (27) sekä voi vähentää sairaalakäyntejä (36).…”

Local government and practice ontologies: agency, resistance and sector speaks in homelessness services

“…How far local actors internalise, are subjectified through and (re)produce 'mainstream' discourses provides one way to appraise their resistance/complicity (see Gazso, 2019, pp. 15-16;Muñoz Arce and Pantazis, 2019, p. 141;Meriluoto, 2019).…”