2003
DOI: 10.1080/0309877032000065190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Withdrawal of Non-traditional Students: Developing an explanatory model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This criticism emanates from two distinct sources. One is methodological and contends that models that rely heavily on social processes to explain attrition are not always relevant to 'nontraditional' students (Laing & Robinson, 2003;Ozga & Sukhnandan, 1998), who are seen as deriving much of their social support from outside the institution (Bean & Metzner, 1985). Additionally, the meaning of 'non-traditional' differs between countries.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This criticism emanates from two distinct sources. One is methodological and contends that models that rely heavily on social processes to explain attrition are not always relevant to 'nontraditional' students (Laing & Robinson, 2003;Ozga & Sukhnandan, 1998), who are seen as deriving much of their social support from outside the institution (Bean & Metzner, 1985). Additionally, the meaning of 'non-traditional' differs between countries.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent initiatives aimed at increasing participation and diversity, in Australia (e.g., the Bradley Review [Bradley, Noonan, Nugent, & Scales, 2008]) and elsewhere, are likely to result in greater numbers of 'at risk' students, presenting universities with the dual challenges of coping with resource and infrastructure constraints, whilst guiding these students to course completion (Birrell & Edwards, 2009). This will necessitate even greater scrutiny of attrition rates and their antecedents (Bradley et al, 2008;Krause & Coates, 2008;Laing & Robinson, 2003;Long, Ferrier, & Heagney, 2006;McInnis, James, & Hartley, 2000;Te Tari M膩tauranga M膩ori, 2007;Tinto, 2006Tinto, -2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of course, this rather undermines the reporting mechanisms that exist in CFE for tutors to record reasons why students leave their course early. This system for reporting back calls for concise single issue reasons and it is interesting in this respect to reflect on Laing and Robinson's (2003) statements concerning the crudity of current models that are available to institutions to measure this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of a perceived deficiency in the key study skills considered essential for HE success in those students entering with non-traditional qualifications (Abramson and Jones, 2001;Webb and Hill, 2003). This might be equally true of some traditional, academic A level entrants, but high levels of noncompletion are noted in those institutions admitting a greater proportion of nontraditional students (Liang and Robinson, 2003), many of whom will hold nontraditional entry qualifications.…”
Section: Non-traditional Academic Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%