2013
DOI: 10.2501/jar-53-1-043-060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Word of Mouth Dynamic: How Positive (and Negative) WOM Drives Purchase Probability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For brand equity, we employed three items that were used in He and Li's (2011) research. The measurement for WOM was adapted from Lam et al (2009) andVázquez-Casielles et al (2013). To measure price consciousness, which served as a control variable, we adopted items from Kukar-Kinney et al (2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brand equity, we employed three items that were used in He and Li's (2011) research. The measurement for WOM was adapted from Lam et al (2009) andVázquez-Casielles et al (2013). To measure price consciousness, which served as a control variable, we adopted items from Kukar-Kinney et al (2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, volume may be a moderator of valence (cf., Kostyra et al 2016). According to the selective attention theory (Treisman 1969), people are not able to process and respond to all the stimuli, because their processing capacity is limited. In order to simplify the processing, individuals rely on heuristic cues and filter out information that is less relevant.…”
Section: Limitations Alternative Explanations Future Research and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now recognised that advertising and word-of-mouth are interrelated and complementary (Graham & Havlena, 2007;Keller & Fay, 2009;Vázquez-Casielles, Suárez-Álvarez, & Del Río-Lanza, 2013). The finding that boomer mavens hold more favourable attitudes towards advertising than their non-maven counterparts (H9) is a novel one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%