2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The work budget of rough faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9). Following these results and previous theoretical analysis (Newman & Griffith., 2014) we speculate that the energy dissipation during natural slip is affected both by the level of normal stress and by the initial fault surface roughness. Further experimental and theoretical research focused on the transient wear stage is necessary for better simulating dissipation and partitioning of energy during earthquake.…”
Section: Applications For Natural Faultingsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9). Following these results and previous theoretical analysis (Newman & Griffith., 2014) we speculate that the energy dissipation during natural slip is affected both by the level of normal stress and by the initial fault surface roughness. Further experimental and theoretical research focused on the transient wear stage is necessary for better simulating dissipation and partitioning of energy during earthquake.…”
Section: Applications For Natural Faultingsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The prefactor k is therefore the parameter that chiefly varies during our shear experiments. Interestingly, computer simulations demonstrated that the prefactor of the self-affine surface roughness is the main component of roughness that affects energy dissipation during faulting (Newman & Griffith, 2014).…”
Section: Roughness Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And if melt welding is indeed widespread in the seismogenic zone, so too may be the process of slip delocalization. Increasing fault smoothness with fault maturity has become the accepted paradigm consistent with expectations from field observations and fault mechanics theory (Wesnousky, 1988;Chester and Chester, 1998;Brodsky et al, 2011;Newman and Griffith, 2014), yet the possibility that even mature faults may be geometrically complex at seismogenic depths has major implications for the mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Strength heterogeneity plays a role in earthquake nucleation, propagation, and cessation, as well as off-fault deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We argue that fault segmentation significantly contributes to the nonplanarity of fault surfaces because, whatever their length, fault segments are separated across strike or connected through fault bends. Although continued slip tends to smooth off the smallest step overs and bends, especially along strike‐slip faults [e.g., Nur , ; Stirling et al ., ; Choy and Kirby , ; Newman and Ashley Griffith , ], some remain on the fault plane even after segments have coalesced [ Klinger , ; Candela et al ., ]. We suggest that these small‐scale nonplanar features form small “contact zones” or “protrusions” on the fault plane and hence produce roughness (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the most mature seismic asperities, which host fewer contacts and are smoother, have a smaller fracture energy than the rest of the fault (less contact zones needing to be broken) [e.g., Tinti et al ., ; Ben‐David et al ., ]. They are thus zones that are most prone to be broken efficiently [e.g., Cooke and Murphy , ; Tinti et al ., ; Fang and Dunham , ; Newman and Ashley Griffith , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%