2005
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The workload of GPs: patients with psychological and somatic problems compared

Abstract: Patients with psychological or social problems make heavy demands on the GP's workload, for the greater part due to the increase in somatic problems presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
80
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
80
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) have as poor a quality of life as those with comparable symptoms caused by disease 6,7 . Many doctors find these patients challenging [8][9][10][11][12] and provide disproportionate levels of health care, which is often ineffective and might sometimes increase patients' dependence 7,[13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) have as poor a quality of life as those with comparable symptoms caused by disease 6,7 . Many doctors find these patients challenging [8][9][10][11][12] and provide disproportionate levels of health care, which is often ineffective and might sometimes increase patients' dependence 7,[13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that patients with mental health problems contact their general practice more often than patients with physical problems [3]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that consultations with patients who suffer from mental health problems take more time [4][5][6][7][8][9] and leave the GPs more often with the subjective experience of a lack of time [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both stressors and depression or anxiety are also associated with greater use of primary care services (Zantinge, Verhaak, and Bensing, 2005;Brantley et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%