Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2647868.2647870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition 2014

Abstract: The Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition aims to define the state-of-the-art in the field and to provide tools for future standard evaluations in personality recognition tasks. In the WCPR14 we released two different datasets: one of Youtube Vlogs and one of Mobile Phone interactions. We structured the workshop in two tracks: an open shared task, where participants can do any kind of experiment, and a competition. We also distinguished two tasks: A) personality recognition from multimedia data, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
102
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…and personality traits, both self-assessed [25], [26], [32], [27], [28], [29] and attributed [29], [30], [31]. Table I The column "Other" refers to works using models different from the Big-Five.…”
Section: B Personality and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and personality traits, both self-assessed [25], [26], [32], [27], [28], [29] and attributed [29], [30], [31]. Table I The column "Other" refers to works using models different from the Big-Five.…”
Section: B Personality and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance seems to be higher for those traits where one of the three classes is more represented than the others, then the improvement is low with respect to a basic approach always giving as output the most represented class. APR on Facebook profiles was the subject of an international benchmarking campaign 3 the results of which appear in [32]. The main indication of this initiative is that selection techniques applied to large sets of initial features lead to the highest performances.…”
Section: B Personality and Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider both the final scalar outcome and the difference of each of the individual vector dimensions as features. Similarly to previous research (Mairesse et al, 2007;Celli et al, 2013), the bottom-up word based approach is outperformed by top-down semantic approaches which employ a more abstract feature representation. As in previous work, LIWC features exhibit good performance.…”
Section: Classification Approach For Direct Speechmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…More recent work in this area focuses on the personality prediction in social networks Kosinski et al, 2014) and multimodal personality prediction (Biel and Gatica-Perez, 2013;Aran and Gatica-Perez, 2013). These trends emphasized the correlation of network features and audiovisual features with extraversion, giving rise to the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition (for an overview see (Celli et al, 2013;Celli et al, 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets used for the training are taken from the Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition (WCPR) (Kosinski and Stillwell, 2012;Celli et al, 2014). The Facebook and Youtube personality datasets were combined and used for training.…”
Section: Personality Induction From Textmentioning
confidence: 99%