2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203873168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The World Bank and the post-Washington Consensus in Vietnam and Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 1990s onwards, the policies that were implemented in the name of the Washington Consensus focused particularly on liberalisation, macroeconomic stability and privatisation, and also included a broadening of the original term to include capital market liberalisation -an extension that was particularly significant in the genesis of the Asian Financial Crisis. Joseph Stiglitz (2008), among others, has argued that this later usage of the term should be more properly called the 'Post-Washington Consensus Consensus', and many other commentators have chronicled the use and misuse of this configuration of policy prescriptions, and inherent weaknesses of its theoretical and political basis -see, for example, Engel (2010), Fine, Lapavitsas and Pincus (2001) and Van Waeyenberge (2006). The whole edifice was based on a blind faith in markets that is not justified either on theoretical grounds or on the basis of historical experience.…”
Section: Establishing a Dominant Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From the 1990s onwards, the policies that were implemented in the name of the Washington Consensus focused particularly on liberalisation, macroeconomic stability and privatisation, and also included a broadening of the original term to include capital market liberalisation -an extension that was particularly significant in the genesis of the Asian Financial Crisis. Joseph Stiglitz (2008), among others, has argued that this later usage of the term should be more properly called the 'Post-Washington Consensus Consensus', and many other commentators have chronicled the use and misuse of this configuration of policy prescriptions, and inherent weaknesses of its theoretical and political basis -see, for example, Engel (2010), Fine, Lapavitsas and Pincus (2001) and Van Waeyenberge (2006). The whole edifice was based on a blind faith in markets that is not justified either on theoretical grounds or on the basis of historical experience.…”
Section: Establishing a Dominant Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition to encouraging political decentralization and aiming to lower inflation rates, budget deficits, and trade barriers, the Bank has generally sought to trim employment in the bureaucracy, keep taxes low, and privatize publicly owned enterprises (Crawford 2006;Toussaint 2008;World Bank 2002). For example, Susan Engel (2010) found in an analysis of 50 national PRSPs, that 96 percent of them had commitments to limiting state budgets. The relatively pro-private sector orientation of the Bank is apparent in its strong disapproval of government corruption (bribe-takers) but surprisingly little focus on private-sector corruption (bribe-givers) (Berkman 2008;Crawford 2006;Engel 2010).…”
Section: Promotion Of the Private Sectormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Susan Engel (2010) found in an analysis of 50 national PRSPs, that 96 percent of them had commitments to limiting state budgets. The relatively pro-private sector orientation of the Bank is apparent in its strong disapproval of government corruption (bribe-takers) but surprisingly little focus on private-sector corruption (bribe-givers) (Berkman 2008;Crawford 2006;Engel 2010).…”
Section: Promotion Of the Private Sectormentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations