2017
DOI: 10.1111/dech.12308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The World Bank on Mind, Behaviour and Society

Abstract: This article critically analyses the use of psychological and behavioural knowledge in development policy and practice with reference to the World Development Report 2015. It examines the main proposition of the WDR 2015, highlighting the behavioural change framework and policy techniques promoted in the report. The shifts that have taken place in development policy are reviewed from a governmentality perspective which offers a critical view on the psychological and behavioural focus in contemporary developmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were surprised to find a general lack of evidence for and relatively little attention paid to behaviour-related outcomes among the meta-studies we reviewed, not least given the attention that behavioural thinking has garnered in recent years in development research and policymaking in general (Klein, 2017;World Bank, 2015) and in discussions of financial inclusion in particular (Karlan et al, 2014). Relatively few meta-studies explicitly discussed behavioural changes, and none focused on them.…”
Section: Behavioural Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We were surprised to find a general lack of evidence for and relatively little attention paid to behaviour-related outcomes among the meta-studies we reviewed, not least given the attention that behavioural thinking has garnered in recent years in development research and policymaking in general (Klein, 2017;World Bank, 2015) and in discussions of financial inclusion in particular (Karlan et al, 2014). Relatively few meta-studies explicitly discussed behavioural changes, and none focused on them.…”
Section: Behavioural Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the influence of psychological science is not merely as a descriptive account of human experience; in addition, people actively appropriate the knowledge base of psychology to promote some habits of mind and ways of being over others. Institutional actors take the neoliberal selfways documented in psychological research, elevate them to the level of natural standard, invest them with prescriptive force, and impose them upon institutional practices of social regulation (Klein, , ). Far from being a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science provide an epistemic foundation for—and sometimes participate in—the naturalization, legitimation, and institutionalization of neoliberalism and its consequences.…”
Section: Psychological Science As a Site For Reproduction Of Neolibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intellectual architects of neoliberalism crafted this worldview from an epistemology that prioritized psychology and subjective experience over more sociological and cultural perspectives (Gane, ). Due to the importance that neoliberalism places on investment in human capital as a source of creativity, growth, and expansion (Foucault, ), proponents have prioritized psychology as the scientific source of techniques for forming individuals who would exemplify neoliberal selfways (Bhatia & Priya, ; Klein, ). Proponents of neoliberalism in U.S. and U.K. governments have appropriated techniques from behavioral economics—a discipline with deep roots in experimental social psychology—to encourage individuals to behave more like the self‐interested, rational agents that neoliberalism assumes (Jones, Pykett, & Whitehead, ; McMahon, ).…”
Section: Psychological Science As a Site For Reproduction Of Neolibermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were surprised to find a general lack of evidence for and relatively little attention paid to behaviour-related outcomes among the meta-studies we reviewed, not least given the attention that behavioural thinking has garnered in recent years in development research and policymaking in general (World Bank 2015, Klein 2017) and in discussions of financial inclusion in particular (Karlan et al 2014). Relatively few meta-studies explicitly discussed behavioural changes, and none focused on them.…”
Section: Behavioural Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 93%