2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-016-1572-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Worm Process for the Ising Model is Rapidly Mixing

Abstract: We prove rapid mixing of the worm process for the zero-field ferromagnetic Ising model, on all finite connected graphs, and at all temperatures. As a corollary, we obtain a fully-polynomial randomized approximation scheme for the Ising susceptibility, and for a certain restriction of the two-point correlation function.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further discuss the real cases 𝜆 = ±1 which are not explicitly covered by Theorem 1. The case 𝜆 = 1 admits an FPRAS [26,22,11], but the existence of a deterministic approximation scheme is open. We study the case 𝜆 = −1 in more detail in Section 9, where we show that the problem is not #P-hard (assuming #P ≠ NP): using the 'high-temperature' expansion of the model, we show an oddsubgraphs formulation of the partition function (Lemma 39), which is then used to conclude (Theorem 40) that the sign of the partition function can be determined trivially, while the problem of approximating the norm of the partition function for all Δ ≥ 3 is equivalent to the problem of approximately counting the number of perfect matchings (even on unbounded-degree graphs); the complexity of the latter is an open problem in general, but it can be approximated with an NP-oracle [27], therefore precluding #P-hardness.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We further discuss the real cases 𝜆 = ±1 which are not explicitly covered by Theorem 1. The case 𝜆 = 1 admits an FPRAS [26,22,11], but the existence of a deterministic approximation scheme is open. We study the case 𝜆 = −1 in more detail in Section 9, where we show that the problem is not #P-hard (assuming #P ≠ NP): using the 'high-temperature' expansion of the model, we show an oddsubgraphs formulation of the partition function (Lemma 39), which is then used to conclude (Theorem 40) that the sign of the partition function can be determined trivially, while the problem of approximating the norm of the partition function for all Δ ≥ 3 is equivalent to the problem of approximately counting the number of perfect matchings (even on unbounded-degree graphs); the complexity of the latter is an open problem in general, but it can be approximated with an NP-oracle [27], therefore precluding #P-hardness.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lee-Yang theorem was recently used by Liu, Sinclair and Srivastava [35] to obtain an FPTAS for approximating the partition function for values 𝜆 ∈ C that do not lie on the unit circle. This result can be viewed as a derandomisation of the Markov chain-based randomised algorithm by Jerrum and Sinclair [26] for 𝜆 > 0 (see also [22,11]), solving a longstanding problem. 2 As noted in [35,Remark p. 290], the 'no-field' case |𝜆| = 1 is unclear, since, on the one hand, we have the algorithm by [26] for 𝜆 = 1 and, on the other hand, it is known that Lee-Yang zeros are dense on the unit circle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further evidence for the hardness of this problem comes from the fact that sampling is hard in the antiferromagnetic setting [56,30] and in the ferromagnetic model in the presence of inconsistent magnetic fields [33] (i.e., the vertex potential of distinct vertices may have different signs). In summary, the algorithmic results of [19] are most interesting for the ferromagnetic Ising model (with consistent fields), where there are known polynomial running time algorithms for estimating the pairwise covariances (see, e.g., [42,48,37,17]).…”
Section: Lower Bounds For the Ising Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above lemma is given in Section B.1. Collevecchio et al [18] recently proved that the worm algorithm mixes in polynomial time when the weights are uniform, i.e., equal. We extend the result to our case of non-uniform weights.…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proof, we first show that MC induced by the Worm algorithm mixes in polynomial time, and then prove that acceptance of a 2-regular loop, i.e., line 6 of Algorithm 1, occurs with high probability. Notice that the uniform-weight version of the former proof, i.e., fast mixing, was recently proven in [18]. For completeness of the material exposition, we present the general case proof of interest for us.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%