1968
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5408(68)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The x-ray debye temperatures of tellurium and cadmium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Debye temperatures derived from the zero strain values of Debye-Waller factor of w is 386K. This value agree well with the values of 377K [6], obtained for w from the powder X-ray diffraction. Glyde [22] derived the following relation between the energy of vacancy formation (E f ) and the Debye temperature (θ) of a solid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Debye temperatures derived from the zero strain values of Debye-Waller factor of w is 386K. This value agree well with the values of 377K [6], obtained for w from the powder X-ray diffraction. Glyde [22] derived the following relation between the energy of vacancy formation (E f ) and the Debye temperature (θ) of a solid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The Debye-Waller factor is an important lattice dynamical property. There is considerable X-ray work on the Debye-Waller factors of W [5][6][7]. But it is interesting to study the effect of lattice strains on the Debye-Waller factors of this metal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed inspection of the 0(T)-curve of both compounds in the temperature range between 10 K and 50 K did not reveal a deviation from the known, normal 0(T) behaviour. This is in contrast to the findings in elemental tellurium (0 O = 141 K), where the C V data show a constant molar heat capacity slope in the range 15 K to 30 K, reflecting the typical onedimensional character of the Te-chain [37,38], The measurements of the subhalides suggest a less anisotropic behaviour. It should be noted that a detailed comparison between subhalides and tellurium is quite difficult from the point of view of a lattice dynamical approach, because of the differences in the crystalline structures.…”
Section: Temperature T (K)contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The beam line was configured with 2-mm vertical slits in transmission or fluorescence geometry using an ion chamber, a Lytle detector, or a 13-or 100-element Ge array detector. The samples were maintained at ,77 K using a liquid nitrogen cryostat (Debye temperature of Te metal is 139 K; Walford et al 1968) and XANES data were acquired between 31580 eV and at least 32474 eV (k ¼ 13) using 0.05-eV steps in the XANES region. Energy calibration was performed by assigning the maximum of the first derivative of TeO 2 to 31814 eV.…”
Section: Sulfur and Tellurium Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%