2012
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/43/435602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The x-ray magnetic circular dichroism spin sum rule for 3d4systems: Mn3+ions in colossal magnetoresistance manganites

Abstract: The colossal magnetoresistance manganites La(0.87±0.02)Sr(0.12±0.02)MnO(3+δ), La(0.78±0.02)Sr(0.17±0.02)MnO(3+δ), and La(0.66±0.02)Sr(0.36±0.02)MnO(3+δ) (δ close to 0) were investigated by using soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and magnetometry. Very good agreement between the values for the average Mn magnetic moments determined with these two methods was achieved by correcting the XMCD spin sum rule results by means of charge transfer multiplet calculations, which also suggest a charge transfer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the reasonably good agreement of the spin magnetic moment derived via the sum rule approach from XMCD and SPES data, the obtained results are significantly lower than the theoretical value expected for the Mn III and Cr III coupling scheme and previous data from AC and DC magnetometry [26], indicating the physical limitations of the sum rule formalism for 3d 4 systems as described by various authors [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussion Of Differences Between Xmcd and Spin-resolved Elecontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the reasonably good agreement of the spin magnetic moment derived via the sum rule approach from XMCD and SPES data, the obtained results are significantly lower than the theoretical value expected for the Mn III and Cr III coupling scheme and previous data from AC and DC magnetometry [26], indicating the physical limitations of the sum rule formalism for 3d 4 systems as described by various authors [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussion Of Differences Between Xmcd and Spin-resolved Elecontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Especially in the case of 3d transition metals, corrections to the sum rule results are required, either by applying correction factors (Teramura et al [48]) or by comparing the XMCD data to the results from multiplet calculations as shown by Piamonteze et al [49]. The latter method has been applied successfully to Mn III systems by Kuepper et al [50].…”
Section: Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was observed for spectra that were collected by reversing the incident photon helicity, and by reversing the polarity of the applied field, indicating that the effect was not due to an artifact of the experimental conditions. Since the d-orbitals are very localized and should not contribute significantly to the XMCD spectrum past the L 2 edge, the persisting XMCD intensity may be due to the excitation of polarized, delocalized s-electrons 24,25 . Since s-states are not relevant to the calculation of m l /m s , the integral was terminated at the point where there was no longer a slope in the XMCD intensity (799 eV).…”
Section: B Element-specific Composition and Magnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%