2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2007.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The XML Tree Model – toward an XML conceptual schema reversed from XML Schema Definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified three main themes related to our work: the encoding of (standard) conceptual schemas into some XML schema language, the development of new conceptual models tailored to XML databases, and the mapping of relational schemas into XML schemas. Even though our work presents significant intersections with research about relational-to-XML mappings [Duta et al 2004;Fong and Cheung 2005;Fong et al 2006;Lee et al 2002;Lv and Yan 2006;Shanmugasundaram et al 2001;Zhou et al 2008] and XML-inspired conceptual models [Combi and Oliboni 2002;Dobbie et al 2001;Fong et al 2008;Necasky 2007;Psaila 2000] (a detailed analysis of both these research directions can be found in Franceschet et al [2012]), the closest research theme is definitely that about the XML encoding of (standard) conceptual schemas. Some work has been done to provide an XML encoding of formalisms for conceptual modeling like, for instance, UML [Conrad et al 2000] and ORM [Bird et al 2000]; however, most contributions refer to the ER conceptual model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We identified three main themes related to our work: the encoding of (standard) conceptual schemas into some XML schema language, the development of new conceptual models tailored to XML databases, and the mapping of relational schemas into XML schemas. Even though our work presents significant intersections with research about relational-to-XML mappings [Duta et al 2004;Fong and Cheung 2005;Fong et al 2006;Lee et al 2002;Lv and Yan 2006;Shanmugasundaram et al 2001;Zhou et al 2008] and XML-inspired conceptual models [Combi and Oliboni 2002;Dobbie et al 2001;Fong et al 2008;Necasky 2007;Psaila 2000] (a detailed analysis of both these research directions can be found in Franceschet et al [2012]), the closest research theme is definitely that about the XML encoding of (standard) conceptual schemas. Some work has been done to provide an XML encoding of formalisms for conceptual modeling like, for instance, UML [Conrad et al 2000] and ORM [Bird et al 2000]; however, most contributions refer to the ER conceptual model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Firstly, XML schemas are hardly readable and a friendly graphical notation is necessary. This motivation has appeared in [6] [7] or [8]. A survey of these approaches can be found in [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fong et al [16] has use nearly all the XML Schema components in generate conceptual model. Unfortunately the conceptual model generated is not UML as this research focus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier transformation method use transformation rules and algorithm [10], [14] , [16] to generate UML diagram. Rules and algorithm has been popular used proposed method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation