2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Xuelongshan high strain zone: Cenozoic structural evolution and implications for fault linkages and deformation along the Ailao Shan–Red River shear zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(172 reference statements)
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the Song Chay and the Vinh Ninh Faults confine both the Song Hong Basin depocenter and the Dai Nui Con Voi metamorphic core complex points to a direct link between the metamorphic core complexes and basin formation. The metamorphic core complexes along the ASRRSZ are often considered to have formed and exhumed throughout a continuous extrusion‐related process (Anczkiewicz et al, ; Burchfield et al, ; Searle et al, ; Yeh et al, ; Zhang et al, ). The basin analysis presented here of the greater Song Hong Basin points toward that Indochinese extrusion took place through tectonically distinct steps initiating with massive later Eocene through Oligocene transtension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that the Song Chay and the Vinh Ninh Faults confine both the Song Hong Basin depocenter and the Dai Nui Con Voi metamorphic core complex points to a direct link between the metamorphic core complexes and basin formation. The metamorphic core complexes along the ASRRSZ are often considered to have formed and exhumed throughout a continuous extrusion‐related process (Anczkiewicz et al, ; Burchfield et al, ; Searle et al, ; Yeh et al, ; Zhang et al, ). The basin analysis presented here of the greater Song Hong Basin points toward that Indochinese extrusion took place through tectonically distinct steps initiating with massive later Eocene through Oligocene transtension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searle () on the other hand suggested that most of these granites predate left‐lateral shearing and thus provide little constraint on the age of shearing. Subsequent analyses of granite dykes within the metamorphic core complex document intrusion ages in between 38 and 21 Ma (Figure ; Cao, Liu, et al, ; Li, Ji, et al, ; Liu, Chen, et al, ; Liu, Wang, et al, ; Searle et al, ; Tang et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Earliest Miocene intrusions are not, or only slightly, deformed compared to the pervasively left‐laterally sheared metamorphic core complex host rocks.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four metamorphic massifs are exposed along the ASRRB, namely, the Xuelong Shan, Diancang Shan, Ailao Shan, and Yao Shan‐Day Nui Con Voi (DNCV) from north to south (Figure ). The four massifs constitute dome structures (Chen et al, ; B. Zhang et al, ), which are composed of two contrasting metamorphic belts, that is, the high grade cores overlain by the low grade shells. The Proterozoic high‐grade metamorphic rocks in the cores were metamorphosed up to upper amphibolite facies with widely developed migmatization, and the Paleozoic‐Early Mesozoic rocks in the shell were transformed into low‐grade metamorphic rocks.…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5 to 8-km-wide, greater than 650-km-long mylonitic and ultramylonitic zone runs along the Gaoligong massif from the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis in Tibet into the Burma Mogo Massif, southward close to the Sagaing zone ( Fig. 1, 2) (Socquet and Pubellier, 2005;Lin et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2014). This array of mylonites was interpreted to have developed within a ∼10to 15-km-deep zone of moderate-temperature (400-600°C) (e.g., Wang et al, 2006;Akciz et al, 2010;.…”
Section: Gaoligong Shear Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of gneiss domes are still extensively debated because a given dome geometry may result from different mechanisms (e.g., Coney, 1980). Several emplacement mechanisms are proposed, including: (1) shortening resulting in duplex structures and/or folding interference (e.g., Ramsay, 1967;Burg et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2014); (2) diapirism driven by buoyant upwelling with inversion of the rock densities due to melting of granitic basement (e.g., Brun, 1981;Teyssier and Whitney, 2002;Whitney et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2015); (3) tectonic denudation localized along major shallowly dipping extensional detachments (Davis and Coney, 1979;Lee et al, 2004) or isostatic rebound caused by extension along a large-scale detachment (Axen et a., 1995); (4) duplex-related folding (Yin, 2004); or (5) some combination of these processes (e.g., Ramberg, 1980;Whitney et al, 2004;Charles et al, 2009). Nevertheless, understanding of dome structures and their roles is necessary to reveal the regional geodynamics of Archean to Phanerozoic orogens, worldwide (Whitney and Teyssier, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%