The Year’s Work in Cataloging, 1999

Weiss, Amy K.; Carstens, Timothy V.

doi:10.5860/lrts.45n1.47

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Aman (1980) concludes that LCSH is inadequate for dealing with non-Western subjects. Wellisch (1981) ridicules LCSH for the "inanities and absurdities" built into its representation of the world. Dykstra (1988) decries the "chaos" surrounding LCSH and recommends "a shift in LCSH from an unruly to a rule-based system".…”

Section: Lcsh: History and Criticismmentioning

confidence: 99%

The coverage of information science and knowledge organization in theLibrary of Congress Subject Headings

Furner

Hjørland

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis article examines the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), which is the most used subject heading system in the world and an instance of a controlled vocabulary (CV).Design/methodology/approachThe method used to examine the system is based on both authors’ subject knowledge in the field of information science (IS) and the subfield of knowledge organization (KO). Core concepts in this domain were examined (1) by checking if they are present or not in the system; (2) if not, by determining whether LCSH contains alternative terms useful for searching documents about the missing concept, by examining books indexed by the Library of Congress; (3) by identifying the semantic relations between subject headings.FindingsThe results demonstrate fundamental problems in the logical consistency of the representation of IS and KO in LCSH.Practical implicationsThe implications for CVs in general are discussed.Originality/valueNo previous study has used our method to examine LCSH’s coverage of IS.

show abstract

Section: Lcsh: History and Criticismmentioning

confidence: 99%