1996
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Yeast HRS1 Gene Encodes a Polyglutamine-Rich Nuclear Protein Required for Spontaneous and hpr1-Induced Deletions Between Direct Repeats

Abstract: The hrs1-1 mutation was isolated as an extragenic suppressor of the hyperrecombination phenotype of hpr1Δ cells. We have cloned, sequenced and deleted from the genome the HRS1 gene. The DNA sequence of the HRS1 gene reveals that it is identical to PGD1, a gene with no reported function, and that the Hrs1p protein contains polyglutamine stretches typically found in transcription factors. We have purified a His(6) tagged version of Hrs1p protein from E. coli and have obtained specific anti-Hrs1p polyclonal antib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that HPR1 participates in both transcription and recombination between repeats. This is supported further by the observations that mutations in different transcription factors suppress either the hyper‐recombination (Piruat and Aguilera, 1996; Santos‐Rosa et al ., 1996) or the ts phenotypes (Fan et al ., 1996; Uemura et al ., 1996) of hpr1Δ and that hpr1Δ ‐dependent deletions between GAL10 repeats are stimulated under conditions of activation of transcription (Fan et al ., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data suggest that HPR1 participates in both transcription and recombination between repeats. This is supported further by the observations that mutations in different transcription factors suppress either the hyper‐recombination (Piruat and Aguilera, 1996; Santos‐Rosa et al ., 1996) or the ts phenotypes (Fan et al ., 1996; Uemura et al ., 1996) of hpr1Δ and that hpr1Δ ‐dependent deletions between GAL10 repeats are stimulated under conditions of activation of transcription (Fan et al ., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Figure 1 shows that the frequency of recombin-mutations in different transcription factors suppress either the hyper-recombination (Piruat and ation of hpr1Δ cells was 56.5 times above the wild-type value for the LY construct. However, hpr1Δ does not Santos-Rosa et al, 1996) or the ts phenotypes Uemura et al, 1996) of hpr1Δ and that hpr1Δhave a significant effect on the levels of recombination (deletions) of the L and LU direct repeat constructs. These dependent deletions between GAL10 repeats are stimulated under conditions of activation of transcription (Fan results indicate that the hyper-recombination phenotype produced by hpr1Δ is not general, but particular to DNA et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ies were done essentially as described (Santos-Rosa et al, 1996) and will be described fully elsewhere (B.Clever, J.Schmuckli-Maurer and…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional co‐immunoprecipitation experiments using cells not overexpressing Rad54p were done exactly as above but using 4 mg of whole cell extract. Purification of the recombinant His(6)‐Rad54 protein from E.coli cells transformed with pWDH251, production of polyclonal antisera in rabbits and immunoaffinity purification of antibodies were done essentially as described (Santos‐Rosa et al ., 1996) and will be described fully elsewhere (B.Clever, J.Schmuckli‐Maurer and W.‐D.Heyer, in preparation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the precise function of HPR1 and THO2 is not yet clear, their null mutations have consequences at transcription, suggesting that their functions may be related to RNAPII. This relationship is supported further by the identi®cation of suppressors of the hyper-recombination or thermosensitive phenotypes of hpr1D as mutations in genes related to RNAPII holoenzyme, such as HRS1/PGD1 and SRB2 (Piruat and Aguilera, 1996;Santos-Rosa et al, 1996) or SOH1, RPB2 and SUA7 (Fan et al, 1996), respectively. Importantly, Hpr1 has been found in association with Cdc73, Paf1 and Ccr4 in an alternative form of the RNAPII holoenzyme (Chang et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%